LOL

Good.

The sad reality of Pitt Bulls is that they attract a certain type of owner. Unfortunately for the dogs those same types of owners tend to nurture the dogs more protective and territorial side while not socializing them much. They're really more a victim of our culture than their breed.

We rescued a Labrabull (Half Pitt Bull - Half Lab) and he's been amazing. No doubt about it, they're a powerful breed and require clear rules but are by no means hard to train or naturally aggressive. Talking to our obedience class teacher we were told that German Sheppard's are the most aggressive breed she comes across.

They're no different from any other dog breed in temperament.

Say Hi to Ninja! :)

Puppy:
https://instagram.com/p/ztc32QQTxh/

Last Week:
https://instagram.com/p/2NLsGUwT3n/

I always found it was hard to go from Civ 4 to anything else. Although Civ 5 did get better with expansions.

Live by the sword, die by the sword. Get over it.

You can never truly know someone's motives, especially after they've been killed. But to me crazy is someone walking outside and shooting random people for random reasons (he thought they were controlled by brain sucking slugs). The targets seem thought out, political and symbolic. The guy was on a government watch list and had his passport revoked. We don't just do that to anyone, you need to have clearly demonstrated a motivation to take up arms along side other extremists.

People have been saying for the last few years that the new age of terrorism isn't large coordinated attacks. The more sophisticated the plan, the more likely you're going to be caught. This is just the new reality the world and Canada will have to face moving forward. I can only hope we do it with wisdom and grace. Not fear and sensationalism.

https://imgur.com/gallery/TqiorT5

*looks at MD news*

Hope STONES has a good FA department.

They're all feeders.

I'm in.

We need a friendly!

Deaf LAF, remember that time you accepted my app!?

Well... I had a great time and learned a bunch!

Thanks! <3 En4cer & ingle

I encourage everyone to spam Tav since he won't come visit me.

I wonder if anyone else thought this was funny.

Sad. We fought SoF side by side for many sets and you were victims of the same fluff you're now pilling on top of us. Some of you guys were outstanding MDers.

Interesting read.

16k farmer

Full turns, fully built.

Handle business MD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o

I doubt anyone could even come close

Just so you guys know, both people need to add one another to their friends list in order to actually have them as a friend.

Add me :)

3711-8850-6415

Wall of text sent. Enjoy :P

I play Pokemon pretty competitively every day on my 3DS. If you need any help understanding any of the more complicated mechanics (IVs or EVs) let me know. I also have a number of semi-perfect parents if you actually want to get down and dirty slaying Japs all day and night ;)

Scode, you're such a clueless fluffing moron that it's painful to read. Most of the time I ignore it because I know how retarded you are and I, along with a huge portion of the earth community, feel bad for you. But fluff off already.


We thought we had a legitimate reason to fight RD. It was a much more legit reason then the one you picked to fight RD that very set and was a way, way, way more legit than any reason we had to kill Rival (like you wanted us to). SoF happily stood between MD and RD and had blatantly lied to us the set before so we decided we would fight the massive uphill battle of fighting SoF. They called in allies like we thought they may, we died and laughed.

Who the hell are you to say we fluffed over our allies when you were the one who put out of context and damaging logs on AT from the meeting you called for and hosted? Not to mention the entire point of that meeting was to undermine the very alliance you're playing in now? MD leaked nothing from that meeting, and news flash you idiot, we never agreed to anything at it. Here's a quote for your hypocritical dumb ass...

13:01 Taveren Lets call it a week from today for now and we can move it up if people are available and get what they need?
13:02 galleri sounds good
13:02 iScode sounds good, pride/randy/prae?
13:02 PrideMD Anyways we all know this information can NOT be leaked. I trust everyone here will keep hush hush
13:02 iScode 100%
(REMINDER: SCODE LATER PUT PARTS OF THESE LOGS ON AT AND CLAIMS TAVS POST MEANT MD AGREED TO HIS PLANS)


When I became a head in MD we had the least political clout in the game and SoF had the most. In that time, SoL, MD, DK, LCN, Evo, PDM, TIE and MONSTERS all died. Suddenly, these small tags aren't being targeted by an alliance of self professed "ruthless killers who want the world to burn". Seriously, you guys tried to gang bang the ENTIRE SERVER last set. I take it as a compliment that we're now a main contributing factor to the politics of this game.


I already addressed the allegation of lying above. We didn't agree to anything and made that fluff very clear in our meeting. Every other alliance there knew that as well, it was only your dumb ass that never got the memo despite you acknowledging it. And you're now part of an alliance who literally fluffed over SoL for 2 straight resets while they were your FDP. Letting them get gang banged by Rival and RD because you couldn't live up to your agreement with a pact with MD. And sent out Facebook messages saying you were going to attack SoL the next set while you were still DPs. (You then cried the next set when they attacked you OOP).


Thanks for letting anyone who has a clue know how truly stupid you are with this post. Bravo.


Why is it the people who are incapable of taking advice always the ones to offer it? fluff off already. You weren't even loyal to the alliance you ran into the ground, yet you run around AT on your high horse. Maybe you should look into becoming an Italian Cruise Ship Captain, it suits you. Oh and when are you going to drop the "i" in your name you pathetic piece of fluff? Every time I read your name I laugh a little inside at how blind you are to your own hypocritical bullfluff. It may also help the number of players we attract to this game, because god knows that when I'm done reading your posts my head hurts. I couldn't imagine coming across another 4,000 of them.

If you want to do both, join MD.

http://www.moraldk.com - click "Apply" at the bottom of the page.

I remember how you liked to play. Build solid countries and kill when you have to. MD is probably the best fit for that type of play. We're more then solid netters and warriors who do both regularly. (The only other alliance who fits that mould would probably be LaF).

And if it's a cool site page you want then go to moraldk.com :P

No matter were you end up though good luck!

Rats, don't be soft. Join MD.

http://www.boxcarhosting.com/...application.php?clanID=MD

wtf lol

LOL

Sup bud, still talking to Mouse? :P

To the surprise of no one.

Jesus, you guys really do live in your own little bubble. I gave 5 concrete examples of how LaF directly influenced your wars over the last 6 sets, and your response is to say they didn't help ensure you won those wars? You seem to be stuck on this idea that because you can attempt to justify why it happened, that it somehow means it never took place.

Let me give you an example:
MD asked for SoLs help last set. I can attempt to justify it by saying "We did so because we took the size and FS advantage you had on us and turned it around on you", but it doesn't change the fact that SoL came in and helped us.

Maybe a little honesty about the role LaF has played in your success over the last few sets is in order at SoF. That's not even mentioning the level of information that you had access to from hacked websites. If you want to stack the deck for yourself then that's fine, but don't play it off a year later like you stood alone in your accomplishments. Own what you are, a bunch of assholes who will try to win at all costs.

That's a pretty big post. Unfortunately it only shows me that you completely missed my point. Why don't you go back and show me were I said anything about SoFs justification for LaFs aid every set. I'll give you a moment to look...

I never did, that's an argument I don't want to have because it's pointless and does nothing but add more stupidity to AT. It happened and I don't really care why it did. You're trying to discredit those facts because you're saying LaFs help almost every. single. set. was justified. I'm just pointing out how reliant on LaF you have been the past year, if you're seriously trying to say anything else, you're delusional. But thanks for confirming LaFs involvement for the last 5 out of 6 sets to help illustrate my point even better!

I hate it when people drop logs on AT. It's lame and a fluffty way to operate between alliances. But I'd like to point out that those Aponic logs are just the beginning and pretty tame. I've seen others (by SoF leaders other then Aponic as well) giving a much clearer indication of SoFs feelings towards LaF. Some mentioning/hinting at open war.

December-January: LaF attacks MD after MD attacks a much larger SoF.
Febuary-March: LaF signs a pact that is breakable only if MD attacks SoF. We're told that if we attack SoF, LaF will enter the war. Making us have to wait for your FS. Also that set, a SoL country jumps into the war, LaF maims it very heavily and begins sending untold amounts of FA to SoF.
April-May: SoF attacks LCN and DK. LaF comes to MD and tells us that if we enter to defend our allies (making the war even), that they have been asked to enter and will. They tell us this information regretfully.
June-July: I wasn't very active this set so I'll assume you didn't run to LaF for help for whatever you did.
August-September: SoF is attacked for bullying the entire server the set before. LaF enters to ensure the war is won.
October-November: SoF starts a war and needs LaF to come in and fight SoL.

5 of the last 6 sets LaF has had a direct impact in SoFs war efforts as outlined above. Oh and if you had your way they would be in this war as well. Just saying.

Too funny reading SoF cry about LaF. Like LaF didn't bail you out literally every set since December of last year. What your leaders tell you about it matters little to me. But I can tell you that LaF isn't staying out because they're mean or because they like MD more.

Double post -.-

Let me start off by saying I don't mind the changes and have a pretty good idea of what was intended. Here are a few of my thoughts on them...

1. 70% is slightly too much to come back with. I feel like 60% would be better, it would make a kill just as significant as crippling a country and a second kill would put a country down to 35% of it's original value (not counting what was taken/destroyed). Not making it totally useless but seriously hurting its warring output.

2. The "floor" on values for restarts are too high. If you invest hundreds of millions into a BR break that offer no defensive help in the future, the country shouldn't come back with 160+ CS. There are times when killing a country would actually be helpful to it's owner. And that seems like bad game design.

3. These game changes don't really make a big enough dent in the power of FSs for my liking. I still maintain that a "Declare War" option should be put into the game between Alliances. Taking 24 hours to take effect. Once in effect the returns on special attacks would increase so kills would take less turns to complete (compared to if a state of war was not in place). This makes suicides less effective and gives alliances a choice between a less effective surprise FS or a fully effective FS but with the enemy aware. Or maybe something in between. The more options, the better!

At least you haven't been kidnapped!

If you think LCNs reasons for attacking Rival this set constitutes a "grudge war", then literally every war ever fought in this game has been a grudge war. Wars don't start out of thin air, and LCNs actions this set are no different then what any other alliances would have done (including SoF). The difference isn't that they attacked Rival, it's that within 72 hours of attacking they offered them a Cease Fire and a chance to pact long term going forward.

They didn't do the multitudes of shady and spiteful fluff that SoF has done over the past year. I'd also like to remind you that SoF started last sets war and are on record as saying that you were going to start another one this set (despite SoL telling you not to touch them). So who's guilty of grudge wars again? Get out of your fantasy world and own the fact that you are all a bunch of assholes and you're proud of it.

I wouldn't call us a "block". MD does what we think is in MDs best interest, at times that has differed with our allies. We have also had significant pacts that our allies have not had, this would go against the notion of a "block" mentality. We are fortunate enough to have friends, quite a few of them, and we'll stand by them when asked and we believe it's the right thing to do. History has shown this to be true.

I'm 100% certain that if you had just not warred this set you would have been left alone and the bad blood that exists towards SoF would have died down a bit as time moved forward. How do I know this? Because everyone is tired of fighting you. The entire server, including your allies told you that but you chose to ignore it.

I agree it doesn't tell the whole story but my point is the responsibility falls on the alliance who isn't able to get their members going. We can't assume that 20 of your members were inactive and if we assumed wrong we would be terrible leaders :P

What? 95 SoF countries hit 60 MD countries. 55 SoL countries hit SoF. A few days later both MD and SoL hit and killed Rival (30 countries). Then a week later LaF (70 countries) hit SoL.

The war at one point was 195 vs 115, in SoFs favour. But for most of the set was 125 vs 115, once again in SoFs favour. And if we're counting first strikes it was 2 each, but you had one that included fresh and massive LaF countries. We're not responsible for making your members active, we're also not responsible for getting your ally to fight back (Rival).

As Sov used to tell me when MD asked for pacts with SoF, "We owe you nothing". Get used to it. SoF of all alliances is not entitled to fair wars, you're not entitled to bullying any more and you're not entitled to winning wars. Earn it like you made everyone else have to.

In defense of our allies SoL and LCN.

Fuji
MD VP

Some of you guys are seriously clueless about last set. Works for me though ;)

bah

bonus