Isnt the -20% military costs supposed to raise the prices for selling now that military tech also raises them?

#1133

http://www.celestialheavens.com/...dia/images/4/48/H5Imp.jpg

Yeah Maki, go away. AT ban still in effect. <3

4

Dear dagga,

Happy trolling.

10/10

I love how you skipped the first half of my post. I`ll just assume you agree with it then.


So you are saying that you show no respect for another clan and that clan cant FS you over it? As for the kid comment. Wow. I`m speechless, you sure put me in my place.


So whats the problem then?


My boy? See this is why I posted in the first place. You make too many assumptions. First that since we didnt state a reason we cant have a reason. Second, that I am a kid. And third that Galandy is my boy. A boy of a kid.

Galandy is not a member of iMag for at least a year. More likely much longer.

You are correct. I dont like the replies and I replied to them. You stated (at least the replies I didnt like stated) that we had no reason to war. I merely said that is a lie.



I see two threads started by imag members. One is mine saying "boo", the other is Xenos saying "thanks for killing me lol". Can you point me to the whiney threads?

As for the post, wouldnt you say that if people post crap about you can come and point out it is not true? Btw, what happened to the AT ban?


No, I wouldnt say we are loose cannons and we care about our actions very much.



Good I say. Let the flag of Liberty fly over 1A. Let all tyrants know the weak are protected by the mighty SoL. The self-styled Defender will smite the infidels and bring peace to the server. Ever watching, ever diligent, SoL will take care of us all, like a sheppard over his sheep. Making sure that no dissidents remain and all obey the will of SoL. All hail mighty SoL, righteous protector of Earth Empires.

Please, stop with the good guys act. Defend your friends, that's fine. Say we like LCN and we wanted to make them happy, that's fine. Dont say you are protecting the server. Dont say you want to help clans that don't have the stomach for war. If you really want that, go join them for two sets. Teach them how to war. Give them your tools, your strats. Thats what I`d expect to see if SoL was honest in this matter. But I doubt I will.

CrazySerb, we used to in E2025. EE is different.

CrazySerb, IRONMAN, no, this is a new game and as such all reasons date back to set #1 at most. Some of the old reasons (for example L:L policy on all hits) become the new reasons since the same problem is still there (those clans didnt change the policy).

After all, IRONMAN calling me an ifail is reason enough. I never insulted anyone on these boards.

Finally, why should we justify our actions to you? On public boards no less. Those who need to know already know. If you feel you are left out, or that your alliance is left out then approach an iMag leader in private and you might find out. Provided that leader judges it`s in iMags interest, or at least not against it, to tell you the reason for a specific war.

You insist on repeating that iMag wars for no reason. That is not true. It is true that it happens sometimes. Since the start of EE only the war against LaF during set1 was without a reason.

booo

So you chose to avoid further talk? Is this how you handle FA talks as well?

I don't understand the point you're making with LCN, that is correct.

You obviously don't understand that if SOL said "iMag FAed LaF" and FSed us, the reason wouldn't be crap, provided iMag actually FAed LaF - much in the same way our reason for hitting Fist originally wasn't.
That`s what I`m trying to tell you. You don't see it as a valid reason, we do.

"- you obviously don't understand that your leaders threatened LCN and Fist on the boards and denied us a pact"

Did I deny that? Anywhere?

Done with me as well? How many notches you got already?

And I wont show you proof. I have no need to prove it to you or anyone else outside iMag. I`m just saying it was not a reasonless war. No matter how 'crap' you think the reason is. As for one country comment, re read what I wrote about it, the same thing you quoted.



You keep bringing LCN into this talk. I thought this was about Fist. Does it matter whats going to happen between iMag and LCN? You are saying we drove you away for no other reason than to bully you. I am saying you could have ended the war in set #4 but you chose not to. We dont net, we have few reasons to avoid warring.



Ok, insulting, works fine for me. And why should I be finding you a quote when you provided no quotes of Soviet?

Again with LCN, go join them already. Why would you say LCN FSed us during the first iMag vs Fist war? I was told by them that we provoked them on purpose. Would we really do that if we are scared? Or is LCN lying and FSed us for no good reason?

We had no reason to give a uNAP. You threatened us as well, so this is moot.



And iMag was pissed off at you. You are saying being "pissed off" is a valid war reason? Or that you dont mind wars for no or invalid reasons?



We dont need an excuse. As far as I`m concerned the war with Fist didnt end two sets ago.



I dont have a problem with you feeling wronged. I do have a problem with you and some other people not saying the full story. The only iMag war in EE that was reasonless was the one against Laf. Honestly I considered that war a 'thank you' to Pang.

Anyhow, fact is TIE received a considerable amount of FA and you were caught doing it. I think its safe to assume you did most of it. As for FA contact, why would it be mandatory? Did you make FA contact before FAing TIE? Did you make FA contact before FSing iMag the set after?

I would say I somewhat like Fist. You did some good grabbing which I respect and you didn't have bullfluff policies. I`m talking in general as I wasn't very active this set.

Saying iMag drove you, while maybe true, is not being honest. It is probably true that you feel we did it. You probably see us as the server bullies, preying on small clans and trying to inflate our egos. At least someone thinks that since I have read it on this board several times.

Truth is, iMag did FS you in reset #3 of EE. We didn't FS you because we wanted to bully you, but because we had a reason. You might say that reason was just an excuse, but I can only say that I personally was involved in target selection for that set. I personally found your countries FAing TIE countries the set before while we were warring TIE and that I personally pushed for a FS on Fist. Anyhow, after that FS you whined, trolled and made threats.

LCN declared on us later that set. I cant say for sure, but I strongly believe it had nothing to do with Fist and had something to do with our grabs and their retals.

Reset #4, you joined LCN and if I remember correctly LCN went all commie and FSed us. It was an awesome FS. We were destroyed. You gloated, you trolled and you made further threats. You were happy, you had a good time, you thought we are done.

We don`t work that way. The best thing about iMag is its persistence. Its determination.

Set after that, if I remember correctly, we had no contact. There were some grabs, but nothing special. Did you think it`s over? You had your revenge, why wouldnt we have ours? Did you really think iMag would leave it be? We survived this long because we don`t leave it be.

Someone will probably say, "grudge wars are bad LOL", but what did Fist and LCN do on reset #3? That wasn't a grudge war?

And we come to this set, you get FSed, yet say you wanted to leave before the FS. And you blame iMag for it. Ok, I have no problem with that. Blame whomever you want, but you cant say iMag bullied you when we had a reason for the first war and you FSed us set after that.

Again, some might attack the validity of the original reason. It was valid to me, and it was valid to iMag. That`s all we want. We have no need for the server to approve our wars.

For the end, I find it very interesting the fact that you are all 'hating the server more and more', yet you continue to post frequently. If you are really leaving, self delete now, make a statement and have a good life.

Pali is so bitter.

http://www.youtube.com/...plBdY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM8qT9Xop5k

So what you are saying is that US didn't have any obligation to any of its European allies (except maybe UK) and that you only entered the Euro war to defeat Nazi Germany because you knew Nazi Germany would try to invade US after Europe fell?

If US had no obligation to its Allies then what you did was only for your own good (preventing a possible invasion or other non military threat as well as expanding your influence to Western Europe). If that is true then why do you (US people) keep saying you saved us?

You left half the Europe in the hands of a dictator of the same caliber as Hitler and I should be grateful for that?

I am not mad at US or anything, I`m just saying the US did what it thought was best for the US at the time. It wasn't running to our rescue, it was furthering its own goals. And that's just fine.

Ravi, I am talking about the Yalta conference that happened in February 45 and dealed (mostly) with post war boundaries of Europe.

Roosevelt and Churchill made the Soviet invasion of 1939 legal and agreed to let the Soviet Union completely annex the territory gained in 39.

When US entered the war they effectively became part of The Allies. Poland was part of The Allies since 1939. Therefor US and Poland were allied at the time of the Yalta conference.

Polish goverment was in exile in London. US entered an alliance with UK etc (Poland too). It betrayed Poland by allowing its borders to shrink.

This is more on UKs head really since UK entered the war because it guaranteed Polish borders (which got changed after the war).

Still US had the obligation to protect its ally and it failed to do so by agreeing with Stalins occupation of eastern Poland.

I was referring more to Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and Greece. Poland in particular, which was pretty much betrayed by the US and UK.

Du Gaulle is irrelevant here. He led the Free French, but had very little to do with the underground apart from being a symbol.

Woah wu-TAN.

Lend Lease was important but it started in March 1941 and the Battle of Britain was over in October 1940.

Not downplaying the significance of Lend Lease or the US, but I doubt the British industry would collapse without it.

I dont think Europe dismisses American contribution. I dont. What I noticed, however, is that US downplays the effort of European countries in WW2 particularly the ones that were under occupation, including France.

For Marshal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFCWaBX2LPI

oh marty!

i^i = e^(log(i^i)) = e^(i*log(i)) = e^(i*i*pi/2) = e^(-pi/2)

i^3 = i*i*i = i^2 *i = -1*i = -i

If you need help sure, for fun I got my own stuff.

blah greek letters no worky.

61*e^(i*2*pi*k) where k = ...-2,-1,0,1,2....

(6+5i)(6-5i)=

6^2 - (5i)^2 =
36 - 25 * i^2 =
36 - 25 * (-1) =
36 + 25 =
61

I am pretty sure there are no diminishing returns on special attacks. As in special attacks increase DR depth but DR has no effect on special attacks.

I am also pretty sure Belts was talking about putting a country in DR so that future grabs on it would be less effective and that that aspect of DR should be removed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4K1q9Ntcr5g

Since when do we use apostrophes on irc?

Let it die already, you dweebs!

hai tai

0 hits fs?

Can you explain that a bit? Are you saying you wont do standard retals if an outsider grabs you? So basically you are making a coalition of g clans that will trade land and prevent anyone from grabbing it?

Or did I misunderstood you?

Deliver! I heard this bewkiee chick is steaming hot!

Awaken my child, and embrace the glory that is your birthright.


Know that I am the Soviet; the eternal will of iMagNum, and that you have been created to serve me.

Actually, it should say "she is an exception".

That is all.

Like that. Finally. Now quit your L:L ways.

EDIT: This post was made assuming its a legit 1:1 retal.

Dibs, there is 8 days between the two grabs by yes (#487).

Though I agree with Foogs long post, I think he forgot to take into account two more factors.

First is the invasion of Italy in 43 (i think, not sure, cant be bothered to look up). Second is the need for German troops to be stationed in the west in order to respond to the invasion of France.

Both Italy and France tied up a number of troops that could be used in the East. I have no idea what that number is or if it would make a difference but if Normandy is mentioned then these two factors have to be included as well.

Just pointing out.

I wish HoI3 runs smoothly on my PC...

War was always part of the game. Even for netting clans.

If your members leave after the first war you have then they arent really members, are they?

There is a wide selection of "whats killing the game, you are, no you" on other threads, spread out across all EE forums. This one still isnt in the club.

And we dont really need another one of those. Keep this thread free! Thanks.

crazyserb, you made them angry now!

Why oh why would you make such a crazed proposal?!

I can confirm that Soviet is mentally unstable.

cypress, i know you from somewhere :P