Search For Author: Sublime - Earth Empires Forum

Sublime

Member
212

Aug 31st 2021, 0:37:00

You guys are STILL at it?

Sublime

Member
212

Jul 13th 2016, 1:09:51

Bonus post

Sublime

Member
212

Jul 5th 2016, 1:11:31

Indeed...GOAT!!!

Sublime

Member
212

Jul 2nd 2016, 1:01:12

HG FTW

Sublime

Member
212

Oct 27th 2013, 0:02:00

Originally posted by PaoLo:

mrford, HG will always be in NA :P

Not as long as NA is part of Emo....I mean Evo....

Sublime

Member
212

Oct 21st 2013, 1:25:07

*was pretty even

Sublime

Member
212

Oct 16th 2013, 23:47:24

Wonder if they'll call in Wolfpack for support....

Sublime

Member
212

Aug 10th 2013, 23:44:25

Emo warring....laughable!

Sublime

Member
212

Aug 10th 2013, 23:43:35

Originally posted by Makinso:

Only 1 saying to respond to that task

A SOLer never dies.... We just restart.

And if we restart now...we're right back to where you killed us at! Great philosophy when you're hitting a bigger tag....can't wait to stomp you in to the ground like we did when you were with AoDT/RM.

Good luck

Sublime

Member
212

Aug 10th 2013, 1:33:54

I read this and immediately joined back up with SoF, because Makinso is a turd knocker

Sublime

Member
212

May 31st 2013, 1:12:48

Thanks for your lack of help Dibs!

And yes.....someone please ban him :-)

Sublime

Member
212

May 29th 2013, 2:01:31

I'll notify you via email if you win......and if it's bogus....HOUSE WINS!!!! jk....I'll pick again, and send dog poop to the person who provided a fake email.

Sublime

Member
212

May 28th 2013, 22:55:52

Thanks everyone :-)

Sublime

Member
212

May 28th 2013, 19:37:17

Martian.....it's designed to gauge enthusiasm thus the scale. The wording could have been better of course. PS would you happen to be the one who said "fluff" in the comments?

Also, it is my intent to send this out as a beta when the initial phase is complete so your voices are heard. Thanks for your time everyone, i knew I could count on my earth comrades for help :-)

Sublime

Member
212

May 28th 2013, 16:04:58

Hey everyone, doing a bit of market research here and i could use your help. In exchange im giving away a 100 dollar visa gift card at random.

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/T7SN3XB

Sublime

Member
212

May 16th 2013, 23:29:20

How about something I don't give a fluff about.

Netgaining....it sucks.

Sublime

Member
212

May 16th 2013, 0:39:33

This list is fubar....you have all your sides completely mixed.

Sublime

Member
212

May 11th 2013, 23:53:46

you tried to join last set rekuyu, don't fib :-P

Sublime

Member
212

May 8th 2013, 14:56:34

Get better gypsy!

Sublime

Member
212

May 7th 2013, 1:59:45

Originally posted by Schilling:

Originally posted by Dibs Ludicrous:

yah, I'll remember that the next time we have to deploy troops over seas. you said you huff it everywhere. start huffing it. should be able to get there just in time to turn around and huff it back before your enlistment is over.

If you're talking deployment to AOs, then YES troops will use oil in that they ride in something to get there. But the tanks, jets, weapons, ammo, water all come in on the same rig.

Once you're on the ground and operational, say from a mission direct deployment (from the FOB to objective rally points, targets, FOB's, etc.) troops spend about 80% of their time walking.

Furthermore, when I think "guerrilla strike" I think guys on the ground, sneaking around (no engine noise/support vehicles in earshot to giveaway someone might be coming in) killing all tactical like...Now, I have this vision of 24 guys killing fluff and another guy hauling around an oil barrel on a dolly for no apparent reason...

Now that wouldn't work....you'd need 24 guys killing fluff and 24 guys with double stacks of 55 gallon drums on dollies. Thus 48 guys, 48 barrels of oil!

Sublime

Member
212

May 6th 2013, 18:08:43

Originally posted by Dibs Ludicrous:

Now Dibs is saying there are oceans....I'm going to have to go to him to buy my military units since there isn't any boats on the private or public market!

Sublime

Member
212

May 5th 2013, 23:49:25

He didn't want to net anyways!

Sublime

Member
212

May 5th 2013, 16:00:24

Take that Dibs....

Sublime

Member
212

May 4th 2013, 17:31:46

Originally posted by Dibs Ludicrous:

they don't understand the concept of troop carriers. they think the troops huff it everywhere.

No...we don't understand the concept of one troop using as much oil as one tank or one jet. Unless of course they are refusing to carpool like us Americans!

Sublime

Member
212

May 4th 2013, 3:10:18

um...incorrect....

Sublime

Member
212

May 3rd 2013, 22:43:14

Qz....we demand "green" troops that are not reliant on fossil fuels. How long do you expect the earth community to rely on these fossil fuels before we consume all of our limited resources?

Oh yeah....people don't drink oil, except in earth empires!!!!

Sublime

Member
212

May 3rd 2013, 22:37:26

No....I love Capitalism. We in America have this fine tradition of kicking ass when someone has what we want though -_-

Sublime

Member
212

May 3rd 2013, 22:34:48

1.) Emo

Next?

Sublime

Member
212

May 3rd 2013, 22:31:17

If you continue to gouge the price on oil the way you have been, we will cease fire and grab all of your rigs. Pacted tags are not safe, we are angry you have limited our pewpew time. If you netters think this is funny....you will be furious when we destroy your finish for the set and cry to the admins to change the rules....again.... So for the sake of not having to buy more tissues, we suggest you cap your oil prices at $175.

Sincerely,
Sublime
Unofficial spokesperson of warrers united.

Sublime

Member
212

May 2nd 2013, 3:14:56

oh, and don't forget oilers....you're welcome too!

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 28th 2013, 4:50:40

Originally posted by Atryn:

Originally posted by Sublime:

Just because SoF FSd MD before MD went after LaF (if they intended on doing so) doesn't mean that going after allies helping allies is illegal, or unethical.

Whoa, wait, hold on there... Where the heck did THAT come from?!?!? We haven't had any ill will towards LaF in a very long time now...

If anyone though MD had any intentions to FS LaF, they were completely misreading their tea leaves, or someone was misleading them.

Sorry Atryn, I was just using it as an example....not trying to imply that there was any MD-LaF drama.

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 28th 2013, 4:48:35

Buch would still be in SoF killing with us if he could use gamesurge.....there i said it.

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 27th 2013, 4:13:13

Well you know what they say about rats. If you see one, there's a thousand. I feel the same way about FA packages....

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 26th 2013, 21:13:41

PS if you want to be FSd next, go ahead and FA LCN/DKnights or jump in with them....

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 26th 2013, 21:13:00

Originally posted by mdevol:

Originally posted by bertz:

Originally posted by mdevol:

Originally posted by bertz:

SOF logic:

LaF FS MD as SOF's ally --> Good idea
LCN, DK sends few FAs to MD as MD's ally --> Bad idea.

But hey this is not new.
This is what war clans do.
Look for the reasons to war, even if it follows a mind blowing logic.

you missed a couple points in there...

SoF got flamed hard by the whole server for calling in LaF. and took a couple FR hits in the process... meanwhile handed MD the moral high ground.

The following set MD fumbled the moral high ground by doing exactly what they had flamed SoF the previous set for doing.

If anybody didnt think LaF was getting called in (even MD leadership has admitted they figured LaF was gonna be called in) then you are naive. I didnt expect MD to take FA in the close even war last reset. The common voice from MD wasnt "it was a mistake to take FA and allow tag jumpers" it is "well how else were we supposed to win?" and "well SoF did it last reset" there isnt much more to say...

the MD/SoF war is over, for now. If LCN,PDM and DKnights didnt want this to happen they should have stayed out of the war.

If this happened to SoL or MD, I would expect the same to happen the following set.

SOF's FS did a lot of damage. Just like I said on some other threads before, FS is still too powerful specially if done efficiently like SOF did. The FAs MD received could even-up the war IMO.
But SOF could still win that war even with FAs on MD.

Also, what is "moral" in this game is very vague.
We have different opinions on what should be right and what should be wrong.

What I'm trying to say is that if LaF is allowed to FS MD for SOF, then why LCN and DK can't FA MD?

SOF is clearly just looking for some reasons to war.
I think you're defending SOF here because you're in a war clan too.
And of course, you would do the same.

LaF ISNT "allowed" to enter the war to make it 2:1. That is what I am saying. but nobody on the server could do anything about it. It was a bullfluff move, but to say it wasn't predicted, that is just plain naive.

I just think its lame to even call in outside FA ever. but meh. I guess I just like the challenges of war.

That said, MD looks a lot better than SoF after the last 2 resets on a political standpoint even if SoF won the wars

Nobody is saying that it was illegal to FA MD, but SoF is holding them accountable for their actions. They aided an enemy, and in return they were designated enemies. Just because SoF FSd MD before MD went after LaF (if they intended on doing so) doesn't mean that going after allies helping allies is illegal, or unethical.

I think a lot of people are very gray on the rules of the game. Here is what I understand them to be
-Players are only allowed to have one (1) game account.
- Proxy use is forbidden
-Scripts, bots, etc are forbidden
- Exploiting bugs is forbidden
- Maintain personally "civil" conduct - No death threats and the like.

I'm not sure where any "rules" were violated....maybe social norms. Then again, who's norms are those?

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 26th 2013, 1:44:44

Originally posted by cypress:

By the way, there is nothing wrong in sending aid to your ally - as long as you're not pacted to the side they are at war with.

That said, doesn't mean the other side can't turn around and bite your hand off for aiding the enemy.

Essentially they are engaging in a cold war; which is their right to do, whereas it's our right to heat it up.

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 25th 2013, 21:39:31

Hrrrm Alin must have lost reception again.....camping out in a tent on someone's lawn to steal wifi fails again gypsy!!!

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 25th 2013, 3:12:15

Originally posted by Purposeful1:

When LCN signs pacts, we hold to them, because that's what we agreed to do. We don't use "out" clauses or "exceptions", because those mean that you aren't willing to fully commit to the agreement you're saying you're making.

Shouldn't you be off coordinating a CS instead of bawling your eyes out on AT? You knew what you got yourself in to last set, it was made quite clear....maybe next time you won't get involved in a war that's not yours and you wont come out of it with scrapes and bruises.

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 25th 2013, 2:33:00

Good to see Alin's Gypsy family has wandered back in to DSL service....welcome back!

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 25th 2013, 2:31:55

Originally posted by locket:

There are what... 3 exceptions I think? All dedicated war clans who dont ever have land and use the lack of l:l to get wars? I could be wrong but I cant think of any other than Sol/Sof/Imag off the top of my head

It could be 1.) warring countries don't have much land 2.) only netters bawl their eyes out and beg for rules to be changed so they can run low D.

Two different world-views....

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 24th 2013, 21:41:23

Moral of the story. Don't throw weapons to a guy that is fighting unless you fully expect to get hit by the guy he's fighting.....hope you can at least die with honor

Sublime

Member
212

Apr 24th 2013, 21:38:03

Originally posted by trumper:

Originally posted by iScode:

Purp, this war has nothing to do with the grabbing issues this set, you guys openly fa'd our enemy in a close even war, you got involved where you shouldn't.

I just wished we could of included PDM in this FS for the exact same reason.

Thanks for clarifying that SoF isn't capable of a 89 to 72 advantage, ;). (And yes, I know you wouldn't say that, but it's just amusing reading between the lines).

My advice to those not in the war whom are clearly being baited, don't be. Let SoF sweat out a few sets expecting a hit each set. In fairness, it's tough for them to net out of a wet bag, but they wouldn't deny that. So make them come to you.

Yeah....we're not capable of 89 vs 72, but capable of winning 90 vs 120....that makes sense!