Verified:

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Jul 2nd 2019, 11:08:46

hey!

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Dec 31st 2015, 18:17:19

Hi everyone and happy new year!

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 5th 2014, 2:08:50

Issue seems to have resolved for me at home (using http://www.earthempires.com - didn't clear cookies here). Will check again at work on Monday.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 4th 2014, 19:55:18

i kept getting logged out doing the CAPTCHA. finally got past it, but still experiencing the same problems (can log in after a few tries, then i get promptly logged out).

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 4th 2014, 15:22:15

Did not work - in fact, now I can't log in at all.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2014, 12:09:47

Happening repeatedly for me. I have to try 4-5 times to log in fast enough to buy my PM before it logs me out.

One browser tab / login. Have tried home and work networks with the same result.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Mar 19th 2014, 12:58:03

yada yada

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Mar 10th 2014, 12:26:46

ttt

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Mar 3rd 2014, 13:16:29

derp

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 24th 2014, 13:30:51

ttt

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 18th 2014, 13:17:53

derp

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 12th 2014, 13:20:19

let me leech

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 10th 2014, 13:44:37

w/e

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 8th 2014, 21:07:19

yay

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Jul 3rd 2013, 17:46:31

This is bad form, but seeing as OP has gotten good advice, can I hijack?

Looking for a crossover, 2-3 years old. I'm liking the Hyundai Tucson AWD or a Subaru Forester. Any feedback on those two, or other stuff I should be looking at? I like Toyota well enough, but everyone and their mother has a RAV4 and they look sort of McAssemblyLine to me.

Thanks, and again sorry to hijack.

edit: I live in New England (lots of snow) and drive 10-12k miles/year, mostly around town.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 14th 2013, 17:48:12

.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 6th 2013, 1:35:25

Originally posted by locket:
Hmm.. far more gracious than I expected....


i'm seeing a therapist right now (love it / recommend it to everyone). one of the most interesting things i've learned so far is about how to deal with narcissists. first, important to note that many psychiatrists regard narcissistic personality disorder as not entirely dissimilar from mental retardation in that it's highly unlikely that a narcissist will be able to overcome their handicap. they have the moral development of a young child and are usually unable to understand the perspective of others, though in their minds they may feel completely opposite, via consuming self-aggrandizement. it feels to me like a sort of "locked in" state.

in such, dealing with a narcissists requires certain strategies, since you cannot effect real change in them with appeals to reason or empathy. many of the strategies are similar to how you discipline a toddler: warning, follow-through. obviously you can't always take this approach if the narcissist is a person in authority above you (which, interestingly, is where narcissists gravitate, since western culture rewards selfish behavior). when a narcissist holds higher status, every message you try to convey must be couched in praise, since that is what they ultimately seek - the praise and affection of others, with disregard for the well being of the other.

one method for communicating displeasure with a narcissist (since they are handicapped from internalizing criticism, however valid and glaringly obvious) is what could be called a "sh*t sandwich," in which you approach the narcissist with praise, followed by the message you intend to communicate, and end with further praise.

unless the narcissist is really far down the spectrum toward being anti-social or psychopathic, he can often digest the sh*t in the sandwich, though it will give him indigestion, so long as there are sufficient pats on the narcissists' head.

this is all really well documented in both professional and popular literature. some people, like ben, may have a natural flair for communicating in this manner.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 6th 2013, 1:16:20

Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
Actually, balin and I have always spoke pleasantly 1 vs 1 however I find myself wanting to farm pdm after many if his at posts


it's a gift!

also, wasn't just missiles - lots of CDs at the buzzer as well.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 5th 2013, 16:12:24

i love it

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 4th 2013, 13:06:43

get a comp-tiaa network+!!!!



jk

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 4th 2013, 12:56:06

Originally posted by Requiem:
SS don't fall for Balin's reverse physiology.


Would reverse physiology be something like the functional actions of biological systems gaining form and sentience to study their surroundings?

Originally posted by Mr.Silver:
RD was PDM's largest source of land however, Tisya wanted PDM to come away with Win/Lose situations rather than Win/Win.


I was having fun being theatrical in my post because eug is silly, but having seen both sides this set, though Tisya did stand up for PDM's policy when we might otherwise let things slide for a more amiable alliance, the fault in the Win/Lose exchanges was mostly bad grabs on RD's part. Can you deny that? There was no sandbagging or "we're going to screw RD!" or anything like that on PDM's part.

Having seen your chat logs with Tisya and how you talk to her, it's unsurprising that she didn't want to go out of her way to accommodate you. And I've heard plenty of your "starve Tisya, starve!" comments to know you at least have a chub for her. ;)

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 19:07:28

my bad h4

ok, i gotta stop posting, but if there was really a way to arrange an in-tag landtrading netting war, i would absolutely man up to your challenge, SS.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 18:54:43

btw, i'm not even PDM senate anymore, so i'm just shooting from the hip here.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 18:53:21

yeah, except that SG ;)

it's "just wari being wari" i guess.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 18:52:51

what if pdm and laf did in-tag trading for a set to see who's most efficient? like wari said, you guys already started doing that this set, though i'm sure it wasn't sanctioned. i'd be so down for that, particularly since we know GA will be nerfed eventually.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 18:40:03

What were your crappy dealings, locket? PDM had LaF on DNH all set, so we were only taking retals on your grabs. :P

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 17:50:28

sent you a PM copper.

SS, hate to dignify your condescension with a direct response, but i don't think i'm PDM's top netter, though at times i have been. we might be talking past each other here, but what i meant to say was that, all things being equal (if we were playing in the same alliance), i'd definitely put myself, wari, ben, and perhaps one or two other PDMers up against anyone in laf playing a landtrading strat.

i'm not saying any of us would beat you playing a techer. you guys have that market cornered and a wealth of knowledge capital for bottomfeeding, news/market camping, and overwhelming smaller tags with retals, etc. although there was one set in 1a that i beat every laf country in a netting set by camping DRs and the market. i don't know who was or wasn't playing that set, i'm just saying that categorically dismissing PDM because you run server politics is silly.

i agree with LT's perspective completely. landtrading takes way less time than bottomfeeding and camping. that's why i love it. i'm pushing 30, with a family, and though it's nerdy and sad enough that i still play the game at all, if i can find a way to the top that doesn't involve dedicating my life to browser games, sounds cool.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 15:57:59

haha. netting in a vacuum is a fun thought experiment. laf's politics have always been lame.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 15:51:38

let's trade next set and you can prove me wrong?

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 15:35:59

hey if you pull your face off your fluff for a sec you'll notice no one's disputing that laf can net ;)

pdm has several (granted, not as many) that could go toe-to-toe w/ your best on an even playing field. agreed, it's the lack of good players that restricts the strategy. you had RD's land to take advantage of all set. thankfully for you the majority of RDers don't see themselves getting played, and as long as chump and tits can t10 they don't mind letting the rest of the tag flounder.

if chump's boner for tisya wasn't so rigid as to lobby daddy to cut off pdm's land, or if laf/rd wasn't so inbred, eug would have less justification in fellating himself.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 14:59:07

Originally posted by Mr. Copper:
Why would I ever want to join PDM? Think you've mixed me up with someone else...


deny, deny, deny! come on, admit you liked playing with us. we had legit good times.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 14:02:34

in b4 "it's qz's fault"

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Apr 3rd 2013, 13:55:33

i just think it's cute that laf has come around after so many sets of fluffing about the strategy.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Mar 27th 2013, 12:51:18

yep

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Mar 21st 2013, 19:11:47

top 5 also-ran's

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Mar 13th 2013, 12:19:42

.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Mar 7th 2013, 16:36:09

+1

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 26th 2013, 15:51:47

america, fluff yeah
fox news, fluff yeah

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 23rd 2013, 17:27:55

guess i'm out of the loop. what is qz allegedly doing?

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 22nd 2013, 19:12:42

A ≡ A

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 21st 2013, 13:51:10

wait, did he ever leave?

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 19th 2013, 13:35:37

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 19th 2013, 2:52:26

SHOW ME THE PROOF, LOCKET!

your alliance is boring, but it's a good fit for you.

laf -is- trying to keep up with our fat grabbing strategies, so you do get a courtesy point for being late bloomers!

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 19th 2013, 1:51:02

how does that (awesome) fact affect anything in my post?

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 19th 2013, 1:37:00

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 19th 2013, 1:35:20

Tired of fighting political grudge wars and jockeying for top spreadsheet-monkey, set after set? Are your clan's policies stuck in the "AT glory days"?

Addicted to the hip 1998 style of this text-based browser game, but looking for something fresh?

Join Paradigm, consistently the game's most innovative and interesting alliance. Spend one set with us and find out why it's true what they say, PDMers have more fun!

Notable Facts:
- PDM holds the server record for the most brutal AB FS and most covert spy op FS.

- Paradigm has an "RPG-style" member ranking system with 30+ medals.
(http://wiki.earthempires.com/...p/Paradigm_Rank_Structure)

- We have two female players active at the moment. (If your clan has <2, you should switch tags immediately!)

- We boast the most active forums on Boxcar and a long, rich history of doing what we want. Adherence to no one's agenda but our own is our core principle.

http://www.boxcarhosting.com/...ation.php?clanID=Paradigm

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 16th 2013, 2:11:54

true story: my mom tried to restrict me from playing the game when i left AT up and she read some of the posts.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 16th 2013, 2:08:34

99/00

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 14th 2013, 18:42:54

Originally posted by Serpentor:
I didn't know you could set people to ignore!!???!!!


it's what makes this forum bearable.

Sir Balin Game profile

Member
652

Feb 10th 2013, 23:45:22

congrats MD, that's awesome!