May 3rd 2016, 7:01:25
Very interpretative ... which is at odds with NFL's decisions.
Noisegate - NFL fined the team $20,000 - Victim: 1 team = 3 Cheat points
Injurygate - NFL fined the team $20,000 - Victim: 1 team = 2 Cheat points
NFL fined the same, both affected one team during regulation game, yet 1 add'l cheat point?
Injurygate - NFL gave no punishment - Victim: 1 team = 2 Cheat points
QB got hurt during game and was reported as being hurt but the level was seriously downgraded. After game admitted the real injury and had lied. So NFL decided not to punish. Now I can understand this site still applying cheat points on this incident, but it should not be same amount (2) as other incidents that neglected to report any injury at all and prior to the games.
But the one that made me laugh the most.
Uniformgate - NFL fined the team $25,000 - Victim: 1 team = 1 Cheat points
Ok yes they broke the rules, which is why they were fined, but I highly doubt this was cheating. More an instance of not having brought more than 1 color of top. And it most definitely did not impact the game at all lol. But this is for team (Denver) that site appears to be biased against. I have already shown just couple examples where severity of same punishment does not change amount of cheat points (only when it suits the site to do so).
Patriots on the other hand shows many instances where it does factor in severity of the cheat and does change cheat points.
IRgate - NFL took away 3rd round pick - Victim: entire league = 3 Cheat points
IRgate - NFL gave no punishment - Victim: entire league = 1 Cheat points
In fact 7 out of 11 incidents resorts in 0 Cheat points. They pretty much give this team benefit of doubt, where most other teams I looked at they NEVER give them benefit of doubt and just auto apply same max cheat points for that category.
