Jan 17th 2014, 4:52:37
from pan's view point, how can you not choose to back nbk over cc?
why should they defend a tag who signs pacts and openly drops them mid-set for a chance to take out another player's month of work?
why would they want to help the tag that defends and protects llaar, someone who has suicided on them multiple times for minor reasons that could be settled by fa contacts?
why wouldnt they back nbk, the tag that will be fighting cc and the hordes of untaggeds for the foreseeable future?
nbk, who usually puts up more countries than cc... a key factor that will come into play more in the sets to come, when cc doesnt have the chance to build and destroy stocks and control the markets and climbs down from their high horse
nbk, who has always treated pan fairly and dealt with them honestly, even when no pacts have existed between the two tags, even when the two fought each other?
but i havent thrown many hits into this war and i dont know what is going on behind the scenes of this server, so my opinion probably doesnt mean much right now... but wouldnt it have been so much easier if you would have asked nbk if they wanted to fight instead of allowing it to go down this way?
it seems that you guys are getting exactly what you asked for