why, aren't there bot countries for us to farm? :P

":P

hitting upwards in nw doesn't give the best returns since 2007 or so. best return comes from "midfeeding"."

If the best returns come from mid-feeding, then, clearly by that definition, it was a mid-feed at best?

SolidSnake, this aptly sums up your post:

LaF greatest country in the world.
All other countries are run by little girls.
LaF number one exporter of potassium.
Other countries have inferior potassium.
LaF home of Tinshein swimming pool.
It’s length thirty meter and width six meter.
Filtration system a marvel to behold.
It remove 80 percent of human solid waste.
LaF, LaF you very nice place.
From Plains of Tarashek to Norther fence of Jewtown.
LaF friend of all except Uzbekistan.
They very nosey people with bone in their brain.
LaF industry best in the world.
We incented toffee and trouser belt.
LaF’s prostitutes cleanest in the region.
Except of course Turkmenistan’s
LaF, LaF you very nice place.
From Plains of Tarashek to Norther fence of Jewtown.
Come grasp the might phenis of our leader.
From junction with the testes to tip of its face!

Funny that you said that eric.

NukEvil is not an FA, VP or President in Evo and never has been. I've probably had more arguments with NukEvil than your entire alliance has. However, SS was Don, a position of the highest order in LaF. Needless to say it was on congratulatory threads for evo that the attacks originally began.

Anyway, there is no current problem and I see no reason at trying to exacerbate or bring old issues to the fore.

My apologies. I should have made it clearer that I was referring only to the large "netting" alliances achievements vs. the smaller "netting" alliances achievements.

Personally, I don't see the point of joining an alliance that has a sole basis to war. I believe they take everything away from the game that used to make it fun. If I was going to persuade my alliance to go to war it would have to be for a very good reason. But we all have our own goals and though I disagree with yours - I can't tell you what to do with your own alliance.

If this is related to primary, why have you posted it on alliance talk?

Torment: I'm not sure why it is so difficult for people to engage their brains before posting, but I was not attacking LaF. I was quite good friends with several of your older leaders in the past. I was referencing to a recent period where SS was Don and I was Head FA for Evo.

I made no mention towards LaF's history or the quality of their members, so it's quite strange that you've gone on the defensive.

Good will to all men.

I don't mean to be arrogant or rude in my posts to neutrals, but evo seems to get a lot of flack for things that are beyond our control.

I don't have a grudge against SoL or SoF, but their members seem to believe the spiel they are told to such an extent that it becomes quite frustrating at times. Evo has not set out to war either alliances this reset or last reset, but of course that doesn't mean anything to them.

Being in a larger netgaining alliance can give you an advantage over the smaller ones, because the larger alliances tend to use their size to dictate policies. There are pros and cons that coincide with the size of your membership base, so I'm not really sure what your point is Son Goku. If you decide to recruit more members but don't put the correct amount of effort, time or tuition in, why should a smaller alliance pay for your failures and have their achievements disregarded?

The problem with earth today, is that those with an ounce of intelligence are few and far between. It's the bigger picture you have to look at, rather than your own gains.

Should your statement have any truth in it then the smaller alliances should quit now, because they can't possibly achieve anything noteworthy, simply because of their size.

Before EarthEmpires Evo has consistently had over 40 members, which renders your point moot.

I like how LaF has now won a couple of avg nw titles now that you're no longer Don. During that period how many did I "lead" Evo to whilst being HFA? Hmm..

You're the tool that led to bad relations between Evo/LaF at the time, because instead of upping your game you bad-mouthed us whenever the opportunity arose. Give it up.

the reason it was 4+ years ago that RaTs ran multies is because that was the last time he played.

now he's probably got about 100 countries again.

Either an attempt at bettering relations with Collab or you've realised that there is nothing left for you to do on this server.

Last reset evo were peacefully netgaining. We had no war techs, oil etc. We hit SoL/NaturalS because you gang-banged Collab with TIE. Don't talk about numerical advantages when clearly basic numeracy is not your forte.

You do realise that Omega and Collab spoke to us before they pacted your alliance and we told them that pacting you would be in the interests for all. We weren't adverse to taking a reset off, because I mean it's so much fun to get war-prepped for a month tag kill two alliances (~half your size and not pacted to each other) netgaining, right?

Grow up.

nobody wants a bloc apart from sol/sof you moron.

Remember when solidsnake used to have an iota of intelligence? Because I'm really struggling.

locket: you're as fluffing dumb as ever.

you hit a 26 member netting alliance and a 13 member alliance that has no relations to the afore mentioned.

congratulations! you're now the most feared alliance in the game. what are you going to do for the rest of the reset? Go to war against the untaggeds or change tag from TSA to SoL and then declare war on a uNAPed alliance?

Fact: Evo did not hit SoL and SoF last reset for personal gains, but to defend our ally Collab.

Fact: SoF tagged over to NaturalS in order to avoid it's obligations to a number of alliances that it had pacted.

Fact: SoL supported them in this.

Fact: SoL pacted everybody from that war (this reset) and anybody else who may possibly have become involved in a war with them reset (in defence of evo or dk).

Fact: Evo and DKnights are not allies and never have been.

Fact: Evo and DKnights probably have more ground to war each other than SoL has reason to war either of them (combined).

Fact: SoL cannot war comprehensively against any alliance that is prepared (for war) or matches their membership base.

Fact: I'm definitely joining SoL next reset, as I'm eagerly anticipating a possible FS on Neofed and Elysium, albeit an uneven fight, but I like to flex my muscles for no particular reason.

I find the way you spell, amusing, amusing.

sol killed me too about 2 hrs ago. weeeeeeeeeeee

lol

yeah, evo were definitely preparing for war.

thank God our minimum military requirements were : 100k troops.

weeeeeeeee

What I'm wondering is why SoL pacted NA off the bat, and then scuttled over to Omega & Collab for pacts about a week ago?

I think this quote from shinigami sums SoL up:
"I'm not sure why anyone is acting surprised. SOL lost their taste for fair fights when they hit the point where they stopped winning them."

whatever floats your boat dragonstick :P

Solidfluffhead sighting!

jakeb haven't one of your FAs spoken to slagpit already this reset?

send me an offline message. i'll hopefully catch you later.

TTT

Primary Contact:
anoniem (head of foreign affairs)
icq: 789248

Secondary Contact:
slagpit (vice president)
aim: jobb1038

got it? good.

evo ftw

some tools just aren't that sharp :p

I recruit for several alliances. SPIN MY PRETTY! SPIN!

+IX goon & head of PR

much like the originator's name laf are to be forgotten :P

JOIN DKNIGHTS!!!

hellz x?

someone who enjoyed your idiotic AT rants years ago.

spin spin spin

mmixx!!

dagga you suck, as ever.