Verified:

clintonista Game profile

Member
716

Mar 4th 2016, 20:13:24

The current rule set has rendered the military base obsolete
no one, and I mean no one, plays it any more

consequently I suggest we change it's function to bring it back into the game
we could use MBs to increase the % of buildings captured
we could use MBs as cyber bases that allow players to raid the public market
we could use military bases as weapon enhancement vehicles like weapons tech
we could do absolutely positively nothing and let yet another complexity of the game become anachronistic

X (fill in your favorite poster) is a fluff daddy pin kitten

beerdrinker75 Game profile

Member
EE Patron
2281

Mar 4th 2016, 20:21:36

I actually agree with you on this one. Especially in express, the military base is pretty useless.
Just shut up and have another beer

drkprinc Game profile

Member
5114

Mar 4th 2016, 21:18:03

the mb just needs to be buffed up the current use of it is fine its just to weak for a short period, I suggest buff it up by 40% of its current amount.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

clintonista Game profile

Member
716

Mar 4th 2016, 22:28:57

I do not believe the current use can work because GDI has destroyed the demand for tanks and troops. Oh no, here goes off on GDI, again. No just an observation as to why no one plays the MB strat. If we empower the MB to buy turrets and jets at a lower price we reduce the competitiveness of industrial strats and further empower techers and cashers. Hopefully nobody wants that result.

I think the ability to raid the public market would be so cool.

cronie Game profile

Member
302

Mar 4th 2016, 22:46:33

Troops still have demand. They have dual usage. Can be used to strike and defend. Its also generally cheapest per networth to buy than jets.

So there is still demand for troops.

Tanks on the other hand are inefficient. Costs too much to buy for amount of networth gained and military upkeep costs also high.

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Mar 4th 2016, 22:51:09

lets make the servers even more different, and increase the already steep learning curve!
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

clintonista Game profile

Member
716

Mar 4th 2016, 22:57:07

hang in there mr you will catch on eventually

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Mar 4th 2016, 23:25:06

and you apparently never will.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Scott Game profile

Member
2383

Mar 4th 2016, 23:31:41

Originally posted by clintonista:
hang in there mr you will catch on eventually



Catch on to what? That you are a moron? Old news.

drkprinc Game profile

Member
5114

Mar 4th 2016, 23:52:49

actually tanks and troops are still in demand a lot of people like to break gdi still while growing so they keep these to reduce the risk.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

clintonista Game profile

Member
716

Mar 5th 2016, 0:11:49

if you check the market volume for both troops and tanks, you will see a marked decline in the demand for both

the statement that the game is just too complicated makes no sense to me
the implication that Express has to have not have useful MBs because players can not learn to distinguish between servers also fails to persuade.
mrford has said several times that he can not keep up with the rule changes and apparently his trainee scott agrees but I see no need to oversimplify what can be a great game

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Mar 5th 2016, 1:08:08

Stop making fluff up and you might be taken serioisly.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Helmut Game profile

Member
201

Mar 5th 2016, 14:57:04

If MB's gave quicker time to market, & faster return of PS's attacks...might be nice, or a tech that did this...also the original medical tech that gave faster rediness return....

Hammer Game profile

Member
877

Mar 5th 2016, 22:43:59

Originally posted by clintonista:
if you check the market volume for both troops and tanks, you will see a marked decline in the demand for both

the statement that the game is just too complicated makes no sense to me
the implication that Express has to have not have useful MBs because players can not learn to distinguish between servers also fails to persuade.
mrford has said several times that he can not keep up with the rule changes and apparently his trainee scott agrees but I see no need to oversimplify what can be a great game


If you are around at the end of the set, you will see a marked increase in the demand for troops and tanks.
If you do not like MB's, don't use them.
Why don't you fluff about the fact that we do not have jeeps for our troops?
If the game is not great enough for you as it is, we would like to see you leave.

It seems earf is back.

Relax lah Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1003

Mar 9th 2016, 13:28:23

i played theo mbr on express sometime last year, selling only troops n tanks n I was in top 20.

I remember using lesser than 900 turns, just a lot of logging into to buy n sell lol

Xninja Game profile

Member
1222

Mar 9th 2016, 15:33:05

MBR can still play, it's just very difficult. However, nerfing it's functionality to be more viable for express is not a horrible idea. Communist was nerfed to help with selling of goods. Don't see why modding MB would be so bad if it's something within reason.

Also, try throwing up 25-30% your land as MBs for CI, might work out cutting your upkeep if it's more productive than increased industrial production. Less upkeep results in lower priced sales for greater profits? :-P
Overlord of Chaos
http://lords.ghqnet.com<--CLICK ME; JOIN CHAOS
Aim:baerninja
MSN/Email:
ICQ:463960159

SuperFly Game profile

Member
5165

Mar 9th 2016, 17:08:25

I build 1 base every set just for fun :)

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Mar 9th 2016, 17:29:35

Old-school earthquake prevention!
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

beerdrinker75 Game profile

Member
EE Patron
2281

Mar 9th 2016, 17:37:51

Originally posted by mrford:
Old-school earthquake prevention!


Does it work?
Just shut up and have another beer

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Mar 9th 2016, 17:42:29

It was widely accepted it did in 2025. Don't know about EE.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Mar 9th 2016, 21:37:18

qz/pang has said that it doesn't work.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

beerdrinker75 Game profile

Member
EE Patron
2281

Mar 10th 2016, 0:07:18

Too bad. End of set earthquakes really hurt.
Just shut up and have another beer

Nerrus Game profile

Member
1185

Mar 10th 2016, 4:18:43

Negative events doesn't add value to the game.
^..^ Surren ^..^

The only secrets you know are the secrets I deliberately let you know.

vatzooland

Member
548

Mar 10th 2016, 5:25:55

anything that speeds up the game, i agree with.