Verified:

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jan 3rd 2016, 22:35:24

I've looked at the news every which way but loose but I can't figure out for the life of me why your first attacks of this reset were wasted on this bot

Jan 03/16 7:52:59 PM EM Time to bomb Saddam (#104) (VIRAL) Rebels of Jamik (#222) () Defence Held
Jan 03/16 7:52:58 PM EM Time to bomb Saddam (#104) (VIRAL) Rebels of Jamik (#222) () 4083 MU
Jan 03/16 7:52:53 PM NM Time to bomb Saddam (#104) (VIRAL) Rebels of Jamik (#222) () Defence Held
Jan 03/16 7:52:52 PM NM Time to bomb Saddam (#104) (VIRAL) Rebels of Jamik (#222) () Defence Held
Jan 03/16 7:52:50 PM NM Time to bomb Saddam (#104) (VIRAL) Rebels of Jamik (#222) () Defence Held
Jan 03/16 7:52:47 PM NM Time to bomb Saddam (#104) (VIRAL) Rebels of Jamik (#222) () 207 A
Jan 03/16 7:52:46 PM NM Time to bomb Saddam (#104) (VIRAL) Rebels of Jamik (#222) () 218 A
Jan 03/16 7:52:44 PM NM Time to bomb Saddam (#104) (VIRAL) Rebels of Jamik (#222) () Defence Held

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Jan 3rd 2016, 22:40:09

because bots dont hit back probably, lol
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Suncrusher Game profile

Member
502

Jan 3rd 2016, 22:48:40

he's getting rid of nukes and cruise missiles to make room for chemical missiles is my guess?

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Jan 3rd 2016, 23:09:07

that's exactly correct.

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jan 3rd 2016, 23:29:49

Originally posted by Suncrusher:
he's getting rid of nukes and cruise missiles to make room for chemical missiles is my guess?
Originally posted by Dissident:
that's exactly correct.


unfortunately that thought process is severely flawed

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Jan 4th 2016, 0:16:58

only for the netters that farm bots into oblivion.

we do it all the time on FFA.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

bstrong86 Game profile

Member
2482

Jan 4th 2016, 1:17:49

Dumping crap missiles. Common practice.
The Death Knights

XI

SAM_DANGER Game profile

Member
1236

Jan 4th 2016, 2:27:57

Originally posted by Over The Hill:
Originally posted by Suncrusher:
he's getting rid of nukes and cruise missiles to make room for chemical missiles is my guess?
Originally posted by Dissident:
that's exactly correct.


unfortunately that thought process is severely flawed


PLEASE EXPLAIN

bstrong86 Game profile

Member
2482

Jan 4th 2016, 20:19:30

Originally posted by SAM_DANGER:
Originally posted by Over The Hill:
Originally posted by Suncrusher:
he's getting rid of nukes and cruise missiles to make room for chemical missiles is my guess?
Originally posted by Dissident:
that's exactly correct.


unfortunately that thought process is severely flawed


PLEASE EXPLAIN


No explanation needed. He said its flawed... So must be true!

But one does have to wonder how they think this is flawed....
The Death Knights

XI

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jan 5th 2016, 0:37:47

unfortunately if you haven't understood by now why this concept of dumping nukes and for that matter even EM missiles in an attempt to gain more Chem missiles is severely flawed I think I'd be wasting my time trying to explain it to you.

Let's take a look at some observations and stats posted to earth graphs for this reset.

Based on:
1) past Alliance performances
2) Alliance gov't types
3) extremely low alliance avg land acres
4) very limited ss/ps grabs by a few alliance members while the rest of the membership spend turns research most likely war techs

there are 5 Alliances positioning themselves for a definite war or a possible war this reset.

These alliances are iMagNum(7 members) SoF(42 members) SOL(50 members) STONES(15 members) VIRAL(17 members)

Listed below are all the players from these 5 alliances that have dumped nuke missiles and EM missiles in an effort to produce more chemical missiles:

#126(SoF) 2 nukes
#334(SoF) 11 nukes
#23(STONES) 10 nukes...and 8 EM missiles
#247(STONES) 3 nukes...and 1 EM missile
#27 (STONES) 1 nuke
#307(STONES 1 nuke
#104(VIRAL) 6 nukes... and 2 EM missiles
#24(VIRAL) 8 EM missiles
#185(SOL) 6 EM missiles
#262(SOL) 14 EM missiles

So out of 5 possible and most likely warring Alliances this reset with a total of 131 players, only 10 players are dumping nukes and EM missiles while the other 121 players continue to stockpile all of them

It would appear that 121 players understand the importance of keeping all missiles while 10 players can't seem to grasp the concept.

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Jan 5th 2016, 0:59:19

Or they arnt at their missile max yet and the ones dumping are.....

People do it all the time. I do it all the time. You are incorrect on this, accept it before you look silly lol.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

SAM_DANGER Game profile

Member
1236

Jan 5th 2016, 1:01:05

Or..... 10 players reached their maximum allowable missiles several days ago, and have since changed their missile makeup to include less nukes and more chems. At least one of those players is back within two of his max again already, but now has far more chems.

If I'm allowed 44 missiles and already have them, I dump say... 11 nukes, gain 7 more chems, a couple EMs, and produce another cursed nuke, am I better off or worse?

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Jan 5th 2016, 1:01:39

Beat you.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

bstrong86 Game profile

Member
2482

Jan 5th 2016, 1:19:07

Id rather have an arsenal of all chems...but thats jusy me
The Death Knights

XI

SAM_DANGER Game profile

Member
1236

Jan 5th 2016, 1:29:26

Originally posted by mrford:
Beat you.


ONLY BECAUSE I HAVE A TENDENCY TO BE LONG WINDED AND BELABOR POINTS.

AND BECAUSE I'M ON MY PHONE.

mdevol Game profile

Member
3228

Jan 5th 2016, 2:07:40

He has obviously not seen the total destruction of a 5k CM fs.
Surely what a man does when he is caught off his guard is the best evidence as to what sort of man he is. - C.S. Lewis

Xintros Game profile

Member
547

Jan 5th 2016, 3:43:15

Originally posted by Over The Hill:
unfortunately if you haven't understood by now why this concept of dumping nukes and for that matter even EM missiles in an attempt to gain more Chem missiles is severely flawed I think I'd be wasting my time trying to explain it to you.

Let's take a look at some observations and stats posted to earth graphs for this reset.

Based on:
1) past Alliance performances
2) Alliance gov't types
3) extremely low alliance avg land acres
4) very limited ss/ps grabs by a few alliance members while the rest of the membership spend turns research most likely war techs

there are 5 Alliances positioning themselves for a definite war or a possible war this reset.

These alliances are iMagNum(7 members) SoF(42 members) SOL(50 members) STONES(15 members) VIRAL(17 members)

Listed below are all the players from these 5 alliances that have dumped nuke missiles and EM missiles in an effort to produce more chemical missiles:

#126(SoF) 2 nukes
#334(SoF) 11 nukes
#23(STONES) 10 nukes...and 8 EM missiles
#247(STONES) 3 nukes...and 1 EM missile
#27 (STONES) 1 nuke
#307(STONES 1 nuke
#104(VIRAL) 6 nukes... and 2 EM missiles
#24(VIRAL) 8 EM missiles
#185(SOL) 6 EM missiles
#262(SOL) 14 EM missiles

So out of 5 possible and most likely warring Alliances this reset with a total of 131 players, only 10 players are dumping nukes and EM missiles while the other 121 players continue to stockpile all of them

It would appear that 121 players understand the importance of keeping all missiles while 10 players can't seem to grasp the concept.



SoF needs more members. Or are some SoL going to stay out of the war like last reset?
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a killrrun" - Xintros
https://www.soundclick.com/...efault.cfm?bandID=1381300

Hawkster Game profile

Member
429

Jan 5th 2016, 9:01:04

I can think of several reasons why 121 arent besides one listed above.

For example my own personal one would be: Laziness. I just cant be bothered to check and see if I have obtained my max missiles or not, let alone look for target to unload ones I dont want.

Steeps Game profile

Member
392

Jan 5th 2016, 13:12:12

I hit max missiles last week, but I figured I'd be diffused before I get a chance to fire them all so I'm happy to sit where I am. Up to them if they want to keep diffusing EM's.

Xintros Game profile

Member
547

Jan 5th 2016, 18:43:41

Originally posted by Steeps:
I hit max missiles last week, but I figured I'd be diffused before I get a chance to fire them all so I'm happy to sit where I am. Up to them if they want to keep diffusing EM's.


Ahhh .. The ol defuseification trick!
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a killrrun" - Xintros
https://www.soundclick.com/...efault.cfm?bandID=1381300

Xintros Game profile

Member
547

Jan 5th 2016, 18:43:41

Originally posted by Steeps:
I hit max missiles last week, but I figured I'd be diffused before I get a chance to fire them all so I'm happy to sit where I am. Up to them if they want to keep diffusing EM's.


Ahhh .. The ol defuseification trick!
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a killrrun" - Xintros
https://www.soundclick.com/...efault.cfm?bandID=1381300