Verified:

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 6:01:57

You want to be able to DEMO a country at war because it's easier for you. Great argument.
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Colo Game profile

Member
1037

Aug 22nd 2015, 6:02:30

LOL wanting equal rights is carved for my "pleasure". You should get your tubes tied.

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 6:04:10

Yeah- you see it's a normal mechanism. You start losing the argument, so you resort to name calling. Perfectly normal.
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Colo Game profile

Member
1037

Aug 22nd 2015, 6:06:13

You realize that defense only works when... someone calls you a name? You fluffing twit...there you go. Now you can use it.

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 6:07:56

It's not a defense, it's called predicting your behavior. And you didn't disappoint.
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Colo Game profile

Member
1037

Aug 22nd 2015, 6:12:06

Originally posted by Celphi:
And you didn't disappoint.


That's what she said.

Scorba Game profile

Member
663

Aug 22nd 2015, 10:13:57

This thread got special in a hurry like so many others have so I'll just give my opinion on the two early topics.


1) LGing someone at war. How would you like that handled? As it stands, it's a case by case basis, with no hard limits set. Policing is allowed, though, so that's a way to enforce it without mods.

There really is no clean way to define this. It is not really a war hit, but may be considered by either side in an existing war as a justification to start a fight with them. If someone grabs a tag that I am at war with, I may go after that new tag as well.

Having police being more common may be a better way of dealing with that as long as there are enough tags willing to police either/both sides of a war in order to keep everyone else out.


2) Is Demo considered a 'harmful spyop'?

To this I say yes it is. Though it is perhaps less harmful than other ops that actually remove military or goods from a country, it still weakens a country and can be used to weaken their ability to hit back if attacked. That to me is a type of damage that I am willing to kill a country over.

Colo Game profile

Member
1037

Aug 22nd 2015, 11:35:04

Dragon, nothing celphi posts will ever be taken seriously.

Tella has a topped thread for a real discussion.

Edited By: Colo on Aug 22nd 2015, 11:37:07

Scorba Game profile

Member
663

Aug 22nd 2015, 13:43:09

Ah, those are usually pretty worthless so I got in the habit of ignoring them.

ssewellusmc

Member
2431

Aug 22nd 2015, 13:50:10

Originally posted by tellarion:
Originally posted by ssewellusmc:

Can we just leave fluff alone and not fluff this server up any more? We have adequate rules, just need people to pay attention and enforce the rules. Seems like it would be quicker to mail you a letter to notify an admin of a complaint then to send a pm.


Um, that's where you said it wasn't. You're telling us not to change anything...

And we shouldn't have to babysit the tards. That's the whole reason I'm pushing for your feedback in order to clarify the rules. People keep claiming they don't understand them(and it was Archaic's post to this effect, not Celphi's, that pushed me to act), and then fluff when they get deleted.

And again, if people are violating the rules, report them and message us. Almost every single time someone has messaged me, I look into it and make a judgement. I don't always agree with the reporter, but I almost always look.

Originally posted by Dissident:
What can be done about untags colluding against any given clan? I'm not trying to give proof of any of this happening or posit that it's currently happening... just wondering what adjustments could be made to prevent such possibilities.


You are free to fluff them up in conjunction with other tags as long as they're untagged. If they're joining in on a war, then report them and send me or bstrong(or both) a message and we'll delete them. I've already deleted Celphi twice this set for doing this...


So you are claiming that me saying dont change the rules is where you say I said considered clarifying them was a bad thing? Who taught you to read and comprehend english... Galleri..Jayr...Marshal?

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 14:52:53

Call it w/e you want.

I hope you like these tags:
xBaDx
Weedylar
Elders
Villianz
Drunksex

Because these will be the same 25 people you play with. It's clear to me, the longstanding players of this server are not interested in creating an envirnoment which makes the server grow, their interests rest soley on making their alliance stronger. Right now, suiciders threaten their alliance.
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 15:14:12

Celphi has something against established and organized teams? Because you just named 5/7 organized teams.

Ill say it again, if you want to net, play alli.

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 15:28:37

It's not strictly against establish clans, because Book has been on TEAM awhile, and I haven't seen anyone police for them. Top10 has been on TEAM for what, two sets? Has anyone policed for them? No, because they're not part of the BIG-5.

I'm not trying to net exclusively. I'm simply giving feedback from the new players of the server. If you want that population to grow, the envirnoment is going to have to change.
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

ssewellusmc

Member
2431

Aug 22nd 2015, 16:21:11

Originally posted by Celphi:
It's not strictly against establish clans, because Book has been on TEAM awhile, and I haven't seen anyone police for them. Top10 has been on TEAM for what, two sets? Has anyone policed for them? No, because they're not part of the BIG-5.

I'm not trying to net exclusively. I'm simply giving feedback from the new players of the server. If you want that population to grow, the envirnoment is going to have to change.


You just have to ask someone to police for you. It requires you to take action and one of the 7 teams to not find you to be a DB. It appears that you are tryin g to lobby for changes that are in your favor to solve a server problem that does not exist.

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 16:23:52

Elders has never policed for anyone and nobody has policed for us. Villains never ask for police and i believe drunksex neither. Its never really been a problem for Elders.
If we ever got into a war and got grabbed to the point where we could not retal, we would probably get someone retroactively.

If you want to net, you have to NOT provoke the war tags. Its pretty clear. Top10 and weedylar finished their netting sets last set BECAUSE they didnt piss off the war tags. They knew who they could grab and get away with it. That and they dont pick fights on the forums. Cuz that shiz will get you killed too. Welcome to nullsec

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:01:09

The point you are trying to make is that there is an explicit arrangement by the "BIG5". It is my contention that this is much ado about nothing. We have explicitly aligned against suiciders... but beyond that, there are no other specific arrangements. We all have retal policies. None of us mess with each others' retal policies... and therefore we rarely fight against each other. It DOES happen though. We have warred bad, drunksex, book, villains, but not weedy. I dont even know anyone in weedy.

So... go ahead and disprove that.

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:03:42

Elders has never policed for anyone and nobody has policed for us. (Not true).
Originally posted by Dreckon:
Elders will be policing for xBaDx... retals and/or kills at their discretion...


If you want to net, you have to NOT provoke the war tags. (No true).
Originally posted by Link:
EVERY TAG WITH 3 OR LESS PEOPLE IS NOW AT WAR WITH ELDERS!!!!!!


How did xNx provoke Elders when I was in your clan? They were randomly picked, no provocation, remember?
There's so many untruths to that paragraph, I don't know where to begin.

Villainz has yet to attack #6. I wonder why. /sarcasm

Edited By: Celphi on Aug 22nd 2015, 17:06:52
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

elvesrus

Member
5057

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:07:52

Originally posted by Celphi:
Villainz has yet to attack #6. I wonder why.


I'm wondering why you think we should be killing it.
Originally posted by crest23:
Elves is a douche on every server.

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:09:45

You're right, you may not always trade messages, but it's a basic understanding to attack anyone to threatens the BIG-5.

You sent ICON a message on taking on suiciders, how come Elders hasn't attacked #6?
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:11:13

@elverus:

The same reason you're killing all the other non-tagged countries. It just so happens the player for #6 is BUG., so he's exemptd. That suicider is OK, because he helps the BIG-5.
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:12:24

We said we would police for bad. True! We did not make any policing hits on their behalf. We would have if it were needed. Its only policing if you take retals... which we didnt.

Id like to contend the whole "this server is dying because of elders" idea. When we came to this server there were 116 players. Now theres 101. Thats not much of a difference. Imo

As for #6... i dont know the deal there. Im not really paying attention to that. Maybe spy him and find out!

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:13:36

Isnt #6 tagged?

elvesrus

Member
5057

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:15:21

Or we know him and his overall intentions.
Originally posted by crest23:
Elves is a douche on every server.

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:15:47

Looking at his news, i see he hit weedylar... think it was a mistake? Also, he hasnt displayed any suicider actvities. Maybe he is, maybe hes not. Im not going to kill him before we know that for certain

ssewellusmc

Member
2431

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:16:59

Originally posted by elvesrus:
Or we know him and his overall intentions.


And it is your decision and does not need approval from celphi.

I wonder how long until he threatens to quit server until mods do what he wants.

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:17:11

I'm just saying- why collude with other clans to kill possible suiciders and ignore #6?

And I'm not blaming Elders at all. I think your clan has played fair and competitive every set except for one. My point is that the server could be growing from 101 instead of declining further.
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

elvesrus

Member
5057

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:19:22

so going after potential unknowns with names like "01000100 01001001 01000101" isn't good enough for you? we only have so many turns per day :p
Originally posted by crest23:
Elves is a douche on every server.

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:22:10

I'm just pointing out the double standard. Suiciders aren't even an issue to you. The issue are players who attack the BIG-5. Because if it were exclusively suiciders, then all of them would be getting killed.
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Celphi Game profile

Member
EE Patron
6349

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:30:48

@dissident:

Where are you getting 101 from? http://www.eestats.com/team
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

elvesrus

Member
5057

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:32:06

Ask those other "BIG-5" tags how much communication there is other than a beginning of set handshake on 'you leave us alone and we'll leave you alone'

Or would you also like to include ICON and SHADY to that considering they got the same deal. If nothing else it protects the rest of the tag if one person goes batfluff crazy.

Heck, you can't even realize that we killed those xbadx suiciders out of boredom

edit: dissi was probably looking at Super Cool Game (#101) and not the number of live countries
Originally posted by crest23:
Elves is a douche on every server.

ssewellusmc

Member
2431

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:36:02

Originally posted by Celphi:
@dissident:

Where are you getting 101 from? http://www.eestats.com/team


I looks like the last country # assigned is 101.

There aren't 101 players actively playing... obviosly. You have accounted for 3 countries #s as you were purpled twice for cheating.

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:36:32

http://earthgraphs.com/...rchstr=&search=Search

Eestats doesnt show dead countries. Earthgraphs does

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:39:44

Originally posted by Celphi:
I'm just pointing out the double standard. Suiciders aren't even an issue to you. The issue are players who attack the BIG-5. Because if it were exclusively suiciders, then all of them would be getting killed.


If a suicider is tagged, Elders is not allowed to interfere. Because two teams on one.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:42:19

Originally posted by elvesrus:
Ask those other "BIG-5" tags how much communication there is other than a beginning of set handshake on 'you leave us alone and we'll leave you alone'

Or would you also like to include ICON and SHADY to that considering they got the same deal. If nothing else it protects the rest of the tag if one person goes batfluff crazy.

Heck, you can't even realize that we killed those xbadx suiciders out of boredom

edit: dissi was probably looking at Super Cool Game (#101) and not the number of live countries


Only if that were the case.

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:46:18

Icon was offered a handshake at the beginning of the set too.

elvesrus

Member
5057

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:46:43

sorry reka, I can only speak for villains with that
Originally posted by crest23:
Elves is a douche on every server.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Aug 22nd 2015, 17:57:23

Originally posted by elvesrus:
sorry reka, I can only speak for villains with that


Yes, true. We chatted. I should have clarified.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:09:16

Originally posted by Dissident:
Icon was offered a handshake at the beginning of the set too.


By Elders? No. I caught on quickly to your BS. Constant inquiries to our plans, our members, who we should/n't allow in the tag. Then you decided to communicate with BAD in a FA matter between our teams. You pumped up war. You exchanged info on knowledge if we were saving turns.

You're a fluff stirring, manipulative, zilch level of integrity player.

Until it says "War Server" when I log in you don't get to throw that phrase around to everyone in a means in justifying everything.

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:15:17

I exchanged NO such information with Bad. In fact, i dont think ive spoken with Dreckon since the first day of the set. So i dont know what the fluff youre talking about.

It was MY understanding that we were all on the same side against untagged suiciders this set. We had that big meeting about it... you were there. And then you guys decided to go all cowboy on each other.

Its true that i sought you out to see what you guys intended on doing with Bad... because i thought we were on friendly terms based on our earlier conversations. Shall i post all of that personal correspondence between us to prove my case?

Well whatever. Why dont we just have a war about it so you can get your aggressions out?

Edited By: Dissident on Aug 22nd 2015, 18:19:45

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:16:52

Why do yall have to resort to name calling right away? Like... cant you talk like a fluffing adult?

Link Game profile

Member
4676

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:20:11

all this because a fluff who cant get enough people to tolerate him is tired of getting killed by real teams LMFAO
Link.


I Am a meat popsicle.


Elders
ICN
NBK
PanLV
SALT
MaK
Valks
CwG

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:21:42

Originally posted by Dissident:
Why do yall have to resort to name calling right away? Like... cant you talk like a fluffing adult?


What word did I use that was name calling?

ssewellusmc

Member
2431

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:22:28

Originally posted by Link:
all this because a fluff who cant get enough people to tolerate him is tired of getting killed by real teams LMFAO


+9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:23:57

"You're a fluff stirring, manipulative, zilch level of integrity player."

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:25:25

That's not name calling.

Link Game profile

Member
4676

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:26:01

why were we trying to be nice to these clowns again? LOL
Link.


I Am a meat popsicle.


Elders
ICN
NBK
PanLV
SALT
MaK
Valks
CwG

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:26:21

I wish to be accurate. Dreckon and i exchanged 3 messages about ICON.

Im waiting for permission from dreckon before i share those publically.

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:27:48

Actually... i consider any ad hominem attack to be in the same boat as name calling. In fact, ad hominem is much worse than name calling.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:35:00

Originally posted by Link:
why were we trying to be nice to these clowns again? LOL


Name calling

Dissident Game profile

Member
2750

Aug 22nd 2015, 18:36:34

Link is his own person. I dont take responsibility for anything he calls you.

You remind me more and more of celphi every day.