Verified:

breeze Game profile

Member
2125

May 24th 2015, 16:29:35

WOW TDK couldn't get the job done so now MD members jump on TDK side to help the pussies out. Well kiss me ass. Say what you want but you all know that's chicken fluff. Now go act big and bad and how you all want to kill Imag. But you all know that's a chicken fluff move.

Edited By: breeze on May 24th 2015, 17:01:22
See Original Post

tellarion Game profile

Member
3906

May 24th 2015, 16:49:10

Usually you talk to your allies directly, not call them out on AT.....

breeze Game profile

Member
2125

May 24th 2015, 17:00:17

I will do that tellarion Thank you :)

133tz Game profile

Member
764

May 24th 2015, 17:09:37

This could jack up oil
I am an EE noob.

bstrong86 Game profile

Member
2482

May 24th 2015, 17:47:58

Dont get mad now? You killed my guy for following pact stips, that you, breeze signed off on
The Death Knights

XI

breeze Game profile

Member
2125

May 24th 2015, 17:54:02

Originally posted by bstrong86:
Dont get mad now? You killed my guy for following pact stips, that you, breeze signed off on


I know what I signed, but not for 3 retals in less than 24 hours. So that's a dead horse. There was no intention to war with TDK until, dumbass buch got drunk and went stupid. So wipe your tears and move on.

Duff Game profile

Member
EE Patron
489

May 24th 2015, 17:54:20

your guy got his land back on the 1st 2 retals (all bar 1%) the 3rd was not needed took the the total way over the stips as you say

bstrong86 Game profile

Member
2482

May 24th 2015, 17:55:55

What os there not to understand about 200%want to fluff about it, take it up with breeze.
The Death Knights

XI

Duff Game profile

Member
EE Patron
489

May 24th 2015, 17:56:58

nope dont need to

breeze Game profile

Member
2125

May 24th 2015, 18:02:06

Originally posted by bstrong86:
What os there not to understand about 200%want to fluff about it, take it up with breeze.


and whats not to understand 3 retals in less than 24 hours. Not acceptable by our policy.

justtaint

Member
664

May 24th 2015, 18:04:46

200%l:l is 200%

It's meant to deter ANY grabbing.
You broke the pact imag.
SlashMD

bstrong86 Game profile

Member
2482

May 24th 2015, 18:05:41

You: pact us

Me: 200% dnh

You: great, sounds good


So all LGs are met with 200% retals. I dontcare how you want to spin.
The Death Knights

XI

breeze Game profile

Member
2125

May 24th 2015, 18:06:45

mute point. I go by Imag policy. so dead point.

bstrong86 Game profile

Member
2482

May 24th 2015, 18:11:11

Then why ask for a pact? You're a fluffing moron. Heyyy pact us!! But we wont honor it
The Death Knights

XI

mdevol Game profile

Member
3228

May 24th 2015, 18:13:27

so let me get this straight, you know you signed a 200% l:l pact but dont accept 3 retals to get to that 200%?


i am honestly curious.
Surely what a man does when he is caught off his guard is the best evidence as to what sort of man he is. - C.S. Lewis

Buch Game profile

Member
1724

May 24th 2015, 18:13:29

A 200% l:l is just what it say Dumbass its not 2:1 its 200% of the land you gained in the attack Ni matter how many attacks it takes you signed it you fluffed up there is no imag rules you signed a 200% l:l pact that is the rule you go by

Untagged Hunter

Member
452

May 24th 2015, 19:39:35

Breeze you dumb ass, do you know what 200% l:l is? Pathetic fools.

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

May 24th 2015, 19:50:49

yes but he (and rest of imag) don't accept it.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

breeze Game profile

Member
2125

May 24th 2015, 20:09:11

Whatever fellas. We don't accept 3 retals within 24 hours plain and simple. 2 attacks within 24 hours is fine. Wait 1 minute after the 24 hours for another retal, then its all good. I know what the 200% is. Like I said we had no intentions of warring TDK or we wouldn't have stopped after the first. So get off that mute point. The tag jumping is bullfluff and you all know it. If funny how things died down and became all quiet until jackass buch did his crap. So we killed him and would have killed the rest, until MD had tag jumpers to TDK. So get off my ass and Imagnums ass.

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 24th 2015, 20:44:27

Originally posted by Duff:
your guy got his land back on the 1st 2 retals (all bar 1%) the 3rd was not needed took the the total way over the stips as you say


first off Duff I'm assuming you're referring to 80% land:land that every clan acknowledges except imag
that's acceptable for landgrabs that aren't topfeeds. The fact that 083 #416 grabbed a country with 185.0% more land than him ( a real schitthead move ) so when xxx #225 retalled twice for 79% as you indicated he most certainly deserves another retal.

but that's a mute point because there was a 200% land:land pact signed between the 2 alliances in question.....and I use the word "alliance" very loosely in describing what imag think they are.

Buch Game profile

Member
1724

May 24th 2015, 20:53:12

Breeze blows

justtaint

Member
664

May 24th 2015, 21:10:38

Breeze, this isn't coming out very well for you. You signed a pact, your member grabbed DK and you broke the pact that you wanted.
SlashMD

breeze Game profile

Member
2125

May 24th 2015, 22:22:20

So tag jumping is ok and allowed. First Ive heard it being ok?

SPARTACUS

Member
122

May 24th 2015, 22:28:00

So you'd rather have 30 countries to join in killing you rather than just the 9 that joined?

ssewellusmc

Member
2431

May 25th 2015, 0:37:54

Originally posted by breeze:
So tag jumping is ok and allowed. First Ive heard it being ok?


I would worry about honoring pacts before you worry about an unwritten rule.

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 25th 2015, 1:09:23

Originally posted by ssewellusmc:
Originally posted by breeze:
So tag jumping is ok and allowed. First Ive heard it being ok?


I would worry about honoring pacts before you worry about an unwritten rule.

+1

KoHeartsGPA Game profile

Member
EE Patron
29,616

May 25th 2015, 2:05:42

Originally posted by Over The Hill:
Originally posted by ssewellusmc:
Originally posted by breeze:
So tag jumping is ok and allowed. First Ive heard it being ok?


I would worry about honoring pacts before you worry about an unwritten rule.

+1


+1
Mess with me you better kill me, or I'll just take your pride & joy and jack it up
(•_•)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6VRMGTwU4I
-=TSO~DKnights~ICD~XI~LaF=-

S.F. Giants 2010, 2012, 2014 World Series Champions, fluff YEAH!

Requiem Game profile

Member
EE Patron
9092

May 26th 2015, 14:03:06

Originally posted by breeze:
Originally posted by bstrong86:
Dont get mad now? You killed my guy for following pact stips, that you, breeze signed off on


I know what I signed, but not for 3 retals in less than 24 hours. So that's a dead horse. There was no intention to war with TDK until, dumbass buch got drunk and went stupid. So wipe your tears and move on.


That **not** a dead horse. It doesn't matter what iMag accepts if you signed a pact with them. When you sign a pact with someone you are agreeing to the terms inside of said pact. Unless that pact you signed states that they cannot retal more than 2 times in 24 hours then what you say is the dead horse.

Many alliances have all sorts of pacts. And with all the pacts they can also have 'unpacted' terms that are publicly posted for everyone to see.

You don't sign a pact with someone and they say thats not accepted by iMag, it was accepted when you signed it.

I can't tell if you're slow to this or just playing games but this seems pretty clear on my end.

Besides all that if they get 200% land off your guy what does it matter if its 2 hits one day then 1 hit the next vs. 3 hits one day? What is the logic behind that?

Ruthie

Member
2589

May 26th 2015, 17:55:01

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
Originally posted by Over The Hill:
Originally posted by ssewellusmc:
Originally posted by breeze:
So tag jumping is ok and allowed. First Ive heard it being ok?


I would worry about honoring pacts before you worry about an unwritten rule.

+1


+1



+100
~Ruthless~
Ragnaroks EEVIL Lady

Trife Game profile

Member
5817

May 26th 2015, 20:00:31

imag - play stupid games, win stupid prizes