Have you noticed that the people who do the most fluffing about being topfed upon are the same people who think that just through the virtue of playing the game, they should never be hit for land at all.

So, a guy with 10000 acres in a scores list populated by 5000 acre countries with higher levels of military and tech can claim "topfeed" when they get hit by a guy with 2Mil higher net than the guy with the land and less, or no military on it.

You people that claim this fluff, are simply pathetic. If you can't defend your land, you don't deserve to have it, plain and simple. Being FAT doesn't make you top, it makes you a TARGET.

someone finally talking sense, the inhumanity of it all...

and while you grab all these "fat" countries you will piddle your way through the set to an impressive 20mill ANW because you were running too much defense, or didnt have enough production, and these people that cant defend their land, will have 200mill NW ANWs despite lack of skill random grabbers

With ps strength giving you a free 50% offense, there is no way to safely protect your land if someone wants it, that is the dumbest excuse ever. I hate that fluffing line "if you can't protect your land you don't deserve it."

And have you ever noticed those same people then cry when you kill off their countries for topfeeding, and my answer is always, "if you can't protect your population you didn't deserve to have it."

lol

just remember that

http://www.earthempires.com/...all-talk/cerberus-28472/1

just throwing this out there for anyone who seems to have forgotten cerbs comprehension of game mechanics

https://www.youtube.com/...ture=youtube_gdata_player

With the exception of TKO and PAN, when did other alliances start accepting escalating retals concerning this mythical idea of "topfeeding"?

Regarding your point about not finishing very high in the rankings, Fordie. SO WHAT!!!!!

I don't give a RAT's ASS about that.

Stop talking about rats ass... that's Mine

agreed

topfeeding is on alliance server

What will get you killed is if you have no defense and all jets yourself when you do the deed. That's not "good netgaining" that's malicious bullfluff that will get you your ass handed to you.

Defend you land? Absofrigginlutley. In this day and age, the occasional big grab against you when you land trade is a cost of doing business, IMO. But those who do it need to know how many times they can go to that well. It's not an exahustove number of times.

Those types of hits are never about being a good player or good net gaining. They're about being a prick and each one of you that do it know that. At least be honest about it.

new rule everyone topfeed tkownd for lulz they get super butthurt.

inb4 sewell starts off on his sexual fantasies involvig me in various gay scenarios

Well that escalated quickly

Took the words out of my mouth

PAN has never had a topfeeding policy. We've simply had an all-jetter policy.

People should defend their land if they want to keep it. That said, with 3 off. allies and the 50% bonus for planned strikes, a motivated hitter with all jets can hit almost anyone, even if they ARE well-defended.

We only get mad when someone is clearly trying to take advantage of the retal system. In those situations, yes. We enforce what Primeval probably considers a top-feeding policy.

only you could contradict yourself inside of one post twain

you cant not have a top feeding policy, only to enforce one you twerp :P


as for the off allies and such, you can have def allies :P

Prime, Tko doesnt have a policy for topfeeding, just like pan, we have a all jetter policy. As for the loser suicider, again we didn't kill you over topfeeds, we killed you cos your single country hit us 7 times in a 48-72 hour period, then I believe your 2nd country sent missiles or special attacks(can't remember exactly) then your other 15 were killed for farming and missile attacks. So please stop bull.

speaking of which warster


rats wants me to charge you for our culling of bkfat :)

Why?? It wasn't needed, well from our point of view, he only did a single hit on us

cause he lost acres during the tustle lol

That tag got what it deserved, we let his 77 special attacks for a retal of 1 land grab go, then he comes back and tries topfeeding us and others. I offered to help him learn the game and he decided to spit in our face, so we will erase him from existance.

But it's not ACTUALLY a topfeeding policy. It's an all-jetter policy that some interpret at a topfeeding policy. A topfeeding policy would simply take into account the networth and land of the two countries. But when one of our players gets hit by someone with a typical build and typical military distribution, it's his or her own fault they didn't have at least a reasonable amount of defense.

And sure, you can have def. allies, but the fact that you can have 3 off. and only 2 def. allies stacks the deck in the favor of attacking.

I defend my land, and as evidence, if I hit one of your FATTIES and you can't take it all back in one strike, like I used, then the excess land is forfeit. I never have offensive allies, so I don't want to hear any whining about it. If you can't defend your land from my little country, you SUCK at playing the game. NO DOUBT there.

hey prime ur mom smells like an off-brand can of spam from india

deezyboy rocks i should make him a moderator after i finish peepin on my neighbors

Really is that the best you have?

Now there's two of you....great!

Hey tellarion go fluff yourself i run fluff around here not you motheruffin fluffface u got me all fluffed up u fluff wit my fluffin click ill fluff u up faster than a mafluffa

Yeah I know Koh 1 of me is bad enough

hey thanks warster i like u too ur a good fair mod

why does my neighbors cat get mad when i pet its butt under its tail

bonus

Except you are really terrible at this game, and don't even know what to do with the land you uave. Why do you want more.

You don't seem to even understand the concept of stocking, so trying to explain to you why you can grab most countries stocking right now would be pretty pointless.

Just let the poor fluffer wonder around licking windows and pushing buttons. No harm there.

hey, lay off the window licking, they're all mine !

Have you ever won a war, or had a decent NW? Who is the one who sucks at this game?

Anyhow I am mostly inactive, but have retallers. If anyone grabs TKO I will get max gains on retals and we normalyl come out with a gain of land.

Game Profile for Cerberus on the Free For All Server
Best Finish: 405th
Leaderboard Rankings
Leaderboard Score Rank
Networth $384,150,516 #326
Land 398,276 #338
Top 100 Unranked N/A
Top 10 Unranked N/A
Best 3 $29,553,609 #340
Attack Success 96.86% #248
Kills 27 #255
Deaths 325 #27
Pop Killed 6,091,281 #164
Attacks 11,167 #211
Missiles 3147 #82
Defends 83,568 #30

Who exactly is it that sucks at this game? Best 3 of under 30m. Thats PATHETIC

Lol

As pathetic as you think that is, KeTChup, it seems to me that I recall relieving you of quite a bit of land that you had no chance of getting back a few sets ago while you were playing for SOTA.

It's amazing that I was able to do that since I sucked so bad, isn't it?

Ummmmm ketchup hasn't played in sota,

Maybe Ketchup and Cerberus should have a 1 on 1. It could provide for just as much entertainment on the boards as the Rockman/Cerberus battle. :)

My country names are Strange Famous. I have almost no defence. Feel free to grab them and see what happens, and what happens to your land.

Also I have never played for SOTA.

My top 3 average is higher then your TOTAL NW ever. Your "skill" is not being able to get enough land for someone to retal you for the land you gain off those skilled enough to have land? That is impressive bud.

Is this guy as retarted as helltard? Hes pretty close.

LOL. You all can just kiss my hairy dago ass. :) It's a game where my style of play violates no rules, merely operate as more of a predator than a sheep, or a vast herd of sheep for that matter. All you guys just hang aroung the game using an external database to locate tiny little countries that you can attack successfully without fear of being even close to being hit back. It's like sheep grazing in a field. The grass is there, it can't bite back, so eat it. Makes perfect sense to those of you who learned to play the game using external game tools. For the longest time, I have been one of those people who really would prefer it if there were no external to the game tools being used while playing. If you can't do it using the in game tools, you shouldn't be using it. I've had this position on things since the before the first ROCK war, in the form of the anti-Rock Manifesto that a certain very popular, entertaining and "peaceful" alliance leader named Cartoon assisted me in writing.

So, if I haven't changed my mind in all that time, it's not very likely that I'm going to. Thus, you have two choices, Either play or not play. As for me, I'm going to play, my way. If you're FAT and on my ingame scores list, and are hanging around in it with less defenses than you should have, I'm likely to hit you up for land on the days that I go looking for land. I don't have the time to go through my day, looking for a tiny little country, that I Couldn't see in my scores list, so that I can hit him 10 times for enough land to build ONE turn of buildings when I can hit one of the fatties in my scores list for 20 turns of building, or more, in one hit. Then build it up, do my thing, and log off since I've done my duty to God and Country in the game.