By definition don't all rivers have currents? So then
Originally
posted by
tellarion:
Can a harbor be on a river? I think not, as a harbor is the designation of a part of a body of water that offers protection from waves, tides and currents. If you're in the middle of a river, you don't have to worry about tides and waves, and typically don't need protection like you would from the ocean.
BUT I can't find definitive proof...lol.
Don't rivers by definition carry a current? Otherwise they would all be stagnant and essentially lakes without enclosed borders.
And, as previously pointed out, there are many tidal rivers. In the local case here, the Potomac River is tidal all the way up to a point around Georgetown. Hence the famous "Tidal Basin" where people go to see the cherry trees bloom each spring.
Further up the river is the various fall lines, which are really inhospitable to boating--strong currents, white water waves, and so forth. So yes, I think you can have a harbor in a river.