Verified:

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Apr 14th 2013, 19:42:59

Noo, Xinhuan is an Alliance spy! He just said all changes should be made around Alliance!
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Apr 14th 2013, 20:11:36

I didn't say it SHOULD. I said it IS. lol.

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Apr 14th 2013, 20:24:53

You said it "makes sense," and you have definitely said it "should" before to me. even though Primary is your favorite server. betrayer! :)
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

LATC Game profile

Member
1210

Apr 14th 2013, 20:45:54

Originally posted by BobbyATA:
Xinhuan you should try to become an admin, or at least the primary server spokesman to the admins. I think all of us would support that.


BTW, hi Slagpit! When are we catching up??


I agree, Xinhuan for president! I mean admin!
Originally posted by Xinhuan:
Are you guys stupid or what?

afaik Game profile

Member
502

Apr 14th 2013, 23:12:41

no i don't play alliance either blid... i much prefer solo play.

i would support the establishment of a consultative panel of players from the solo servers to input to future proposed developments, before they are implemented. the current changes are a strong example of why this is required. and yes, xinhuan should be president!

Serpentor Game profile

Member
2800

Apr 15th 2013, 4:55:31

That's a great idea afaik. It sucks when plans are made around one server that probably won't even matter that much, yet the side effects to the other servers are huge yet ignored.
The EEVIL Empire

OneMansArmy Game profile

Member
376

Apr 15th 2013, 5:34:48

We have Alliance members playing Primary who message countries to come join their clan and play on Alliance.

But do we have any Primary players in Alliance who message people to come test their skills in Primary?

Other than Earth Empires I also play Battlefield games:
http://www.youtube.com/user/UneManArmy/featured

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
4649

Apr 15th 2013, 5:41:51

The only interest alliance people showed in playing here was to gang up and do kill runs on solo players. I thoroughly enjoyed deleting them back in the days of "spirit of the rules".

Besides, why would anyone want to play on a server where you can't landtrade?

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Apr 15th 2013, 5:51:30

Originally posted by OneMansArmy:
But do we have any Primary players in Alliance who message people to come test their skills in Primary?


Yes, I do this every reset.

Rob Game profile

Member
1105

Apr 15th 2013, 7:52:07

Is it not practical to keep Primary as it is while Alliance is changed to whatever is deemed fit?

oldman Game profile

Member
877

Apr 15th 2013, 12:36:06

Originally posted by Rob:
Is it not practical to keep Primary as it is while Alliance is changed to whatever is deemed fit?


I think it's definitely possible. Alliance and express are the 2 servers which have the new changes implemented. The rest are still running on the old rules.

Rob Game profile

Member
1105

Apr 15th 2013, 15:53:25

Then they should keep it as it is. Lets lobby them before the round starts.

BobbyATA Game profile

Member
2367

Apr 15th 2013, 16:01:59

agreed. Someone make a thread on B&S asking them not to change any rules for primary and then link us there.

BobbyATA Game profile

Member
2367

Apr 15th 2013, 16:06:37

btw top 5 predictions (a little ez this set):

Laughter in Manslaughter
Mr Perfectz
Passion Fruit Cheesecake
fearvendor (Isn't this guy normally LG'd midset most sets?)
Narcsissistic (what a great set!)

Laughter has a great chance at breaking the previous NW record of 165M. But that will depend on food, and I'm already surprised food seems to actually be moving up a bit.

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Apr 15th 2013, 16:10:36

I think you're leaning too heavily into the casher scores. I'd say:

1) Laughter
2) Perfectz
3) Narcissistic

It's gonna be tight for the top spot.
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

AndrewMose Game profile

Member
1066

Apr 15th 2013, 16:24:47

One thing that may actually hurt cashers is that there aren't many midfeed targets that are cashers like in previous sets. It's not that big of a deal just some extra destroying and rebuilding.

But I agree with Bobby that this is the best Casher set we have seen and if the top two finish well there could be records. They both seem to be in line or ahead of Oldman's casher from a couple of sets ago.

1)Perfectz
2)Laughter
3)Narcissistic

The next 7 will be
3 More cashers (Fear, Passion, Cake)
3 More Indies (up for grabs)
1 Farmer (Primary Cause)

Serpentor Game profile

Member
2800

Apr 16th 2013, 4:19:27

I'm probably out of t10 this set. I say Narcissistic for the win!!

I just wanna see an Indy win again to show its still possible. Lol
The EEVIL Empire

The Cloaked Game profile

Member
491

Apr 16th 2013, 5:53:52

does fearvendor normally research and off leach?

might explain why he's doing so much better this set, bobby.

Rob Game profile

Member
1105

Apr 16th 2013, 7:37:55

3 cashers
2 commies
2 farmers
2 techers

And the last spot to a casher or commie

h2orich Game profile

Member
2245

Apr 16th 2013, 10:23:42

<ee> PS FortySix and Two (#125) [] --> Narcissistic (#175) [] -- 7776A/11484A

Tsk. Random top feeder.

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Apr 16th 2013, 11:08:36

What a stupid attack.
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

BobbyATA Game profile

Member
2367

Apr 16th 2013, 11:18:21

2013-04-16 11:15:02 PS Dont hit the hand that feeds (#21) pinafore (#214) 5794A (8551A)
2013-04-15 11:15:52 PS Dont hit the hand that feeds (#21) FortySix and Two (#125) 5646A (8333A)
2013-04-15 10:25:22 PS FortySix and Two (#125) Dont hit the hand that feeds (#21) 646A (1268A)
2013-04-15 03:49:33 PS Cloaked plays like Slothstronaut (#194) Dont hit the hand that feeds (#21) 668A (1322A)
2013-04-15 02:05:33 PS pinafore (#214) Dont hit the hand that feeds (#21) 716A (1359A)

nice retals. 1 more coming. Lots of big countries getting hit in last 24 hours ...

PaleMoon Game profile

Member
294

Apr 16th 2013, 11:42:12

I'm not sure what I'm more worried at this stage... random topfeeds like that of #125, or continuing to lose e50-100k tech a day to spy ops. -.-

This country name is so accurate: Commit Espionage is so broken (#184)
"imo the true issue over there is and always has been palemoon." - Vic (Mr. Clear)

La Famiglia

h2orich Game profile

Member
2245

Apr 16th 2013, 11:53:12

Yea Bobby, I noticed that as well, top 20 countries hitting top 10 countries.

AndrewMose Game profile

Member
1066

Apr 16th 2013, 12:51:48

Originally posted by The Cloaked:
does fearvendor normally research and off leach?

might explain why he's doing so much better this set, bobby.


I have seen a ton of OA's this set. Many more then previous sets. I have passed by a lot of targets that have minimal defense but 3 good OA's. You just can't defend yourself against 3 OAs and a country that will go all jets.

AndrewMose Game profile

Member
1066

Apr 16th 2013, 12:57:32

2013-04-16 00:38:22 PS fearvendor (#50) Land of Asia (#102) 1404A (2538A)

I've got to think that was another mistake.

AndrewMose Game profile

Member
1066

Apr 16th 2013, 13:38:54

Originally posted by Rob:
3 cashers
2 commies
2 farmers
2 techers

And the last spot to a casher or commie



I didn't see the 2nd farmer. I believe you are correct with the exception of 2 techers. I don't see how more then 1 can make it. And even the best techer I think will struggle to pass some of the commies.

4 cashers, 4 commies, 2 farmers.

The Cloaked Game profile

Member
491

Apr 16th 2013, 15:48:49

<ee> PS FortySix and Two (#125) [] --> Narcissistic (#175) [] -- 7776A/11484A

attacks like that are strictly sabotage. There is nothing for the attacker to gain and it'll cost 5m+ NW to rebuild the acres the attacker will lose on the retal.

BobbyATA Game profile

Member
2367

Apr 16th 2013, 17:37:45

[quote poster=The Cloaked; 23423; 446757]<ee> PS FortySix and Two (#125) [] --> Narcissistic (#175) [] -- 7776A/11484A

attacks like that are strictly sabotage. There is nothing for the attacker to gain and it'll cost 5m+ NW to rebuild the acres the attacker will lose on the retal. [/quote]

I think the attack was a real fluff move and I don't condone it. But, the attack did net 5k acres ish in the end. Yes the rebuild costs will be huge, but 5k acres is about 3 days grabbing right now at the rates most of us c/i are growing. I would have to see the math before I was convinced the attack wasn't beneficial

BobbyATA Game profile

Member
2367

Apr 16th 2013, 17:38:38

If fearvendor keeps grabbing like he is he won't even finish t10...

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Apr 16th 2013, 23:19:44

Maybe Narcissist will attack that guy again tomorrow.
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

The Cloaked Game profile

Member
491

Apr 16th 2013, 23:42:47

I think land of asia has already decided who's facing his wrath this set.

AzNiZe Game profile

Member
358

Apr 17th 2013, 13:35:12

Boring war

Magellaan Game profile

Member
533

Apr 17th 2013, 19:56:50

[quote poster=The Cloaked; 23423; 446757]<ee> PS FortySix and Two (#125) [] --> Narcissistic (#175) [] -- 7776A/11484A

attacks like that are strictly sabotage. There is nothing for the attacker to gain and it'll cost 5m+ NW to rebuild the acres the attacker will lose on the retal. [/quote]

Rebuild costs are about $250-300 million, not that bad I think and the cost of jets and oil were less than if I had to bottomfeed those 5k acres. And targets are getting scarce leading to me to bottomfeed targets that can potentially retal like one already did. I know that mathematically or cost-wise it makes more sense to bottomfeed but the lack of targets made me try out this topfeeding thing.
Am I a total fluffhead for topfeeding someone who's having such an amazing set? Well.. yes, I won't deny that. But it wasn't done to sabotage, it was done to benefit myself.
Not MD, fake Magellaan.

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Apr 17th 2013, 21:17:41

We'll see if it benefits you. He played today and didn't make any attacks. He may be gearing up to make you pay.
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

Karim Game profile

Member
761

Apr 18th 2013, 5:25:51

And 1 retal to take: this is a strange set with lots of weird attacks.

I hope you don't get involved into a late war: would be stupid for all the involved (me too considering the DA) ;)
-[Panzer Division MD]-

BobbyATA Game profile

Member
2367

Apr 18th 2013, 14:28:03

2013-04-18 12:27:30 PS Commit Espionage is so broken (#184) Aggressive Mediocrity (#186) 3567A (5822A)

2013-03-17 08:16:55 PS Aggressive Mediocrity (#186) Commit Espionage is so broken (#184) 120A (267A)

lol...1 month retals

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Apr 18th 2013, 14:29:32

Well, Commit Espionage is bigger than Aggressive Mediocrity now. It's sort of a landgrab, then.
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

BobbyATA Game profile

Member
2367

Apr 18th 2013, 14:35:32

I'm sure AM can retal.

AndrewMose Game profile

Member
1066

Apr 18th 2013, 14:40:49

Not if everyone stopped selling oil

Serpentor Game profile

Member
2800

Apr 18th 2013, 15:09:44

this ain't alliance server remember. You're not entitled to a retal. he can LG him back if he feels like he can enforce it. I'm sure he'll have to withstand an ABing and spy battle though to do so. ;-)

The EEVIL Empire

BobbyATA Game profile

Member
2367

Apr 18th 2013, 15:12:23

My point is it wasn't an LG b/c AM could easily retal 184. 184 is trying to take advantage of the threat that doing so could open AM up to potential war.

Don't be a dumbass Serp...

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Apr 18th 2013, 15:53:24

Well, attacking a guy who ends up being 5m networth bigger than you is a pretty big mistake. There's something to be said for that.
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

Serpentor Game profile

Member
2800

Apr 18th 2013, 17:55:53

Agreed.

I hate this "Retal" argument. So you're saying that if you PS someone and they don't PS you back within 72 hrs or so that they aren't allowed to PS your country for the remainder of the set? You instigate and expect them to respect that? You have no tag protecting you, and hitting them twice is enough of a disrespect to warrant what you get in return.

Each country is allowed to hit each other once per set under the GDI rules without letting yourself get f'd up. There's no rule stating that if you hit him early that he can't hit you late if you are a viable target. If you're in GDI then follow GDI rules not Alliance server rules.

This is coming from one of the biggest LGers on the server remember.
The EEVIL Empire

Serpentor Game profile

Member
2800

Apr 18th 2013, 17:57:01

On a side topic....

Is 100m going to be tough to achieve now?
The EEVIL Empire

Chewi Game profile

Member
867

Apr 18th 2013, 18:18:45

Originally posted by Serpentor:
Agreed.

I hate this "Retal" argument. So you're saying that if you PS someone and they don't PS you back within 72 hrs or so that they aren't allowed to PS your country for the remainder of the set? You instigate and expect them to respect that? You have no tag protecting you, and hitting them twice is enough of a disrespect to warrant what you get in return.

Each country is allowed to hit each other once per set under the GDI rules without letting yourself get f'd up. There's no rule stating that if you hit him early that he can't hit you late if you are a viable target. If you're in GDI then follow GDI rules not Alliance server rules.

This is coming from one of the biggest LGers on the server remember.


Each person can enforce his own retal rules.

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Apr 18th 2013, 18:44:49

Yeah. I personally might take exception to a hit like that, I might consider it a grab and might retal. But if the guy is 5m nw bigger than me, maybe not.
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

AndrewMose Game profile

Member
1066

Apr 18th 2013, 19:38:04

This could be interesting...

2013-04-18 19:26:22 PS Narcissistic (#175) FortySix and Two (#125) 3561A (4566A)
2013-04-18 19:25:14 SS Narcissistic (#175) FortySix and Two (#125) 2586A (3748A)
2013-04-18 19:24:23 SS Narcissistic (#175) FortySix and Two (#125) 2862A (4431A)
2013-04-16 15:43:27 PS Narcissistic (#175) FortySix and Two (#125) 6291A (8876A)
2013-04-16 10:21:52 PS FortySix and Two (#125) Narcissistic (#175) 7776A (11484A)

Serpentor Game profile

Member
2800

Apr 18th 2013, 19:46:50

WOW!!!
The EEVIL Empire

LATC Game profile

Member
1210

Apr 18th 2013, 19:52:43

I agree with you Serp. As the aggressor why are you entitled to keep the land after 72 hours? Based on the GDI rules and rules of primary wouldn't it be smart for me to retal when it's most optimal for me? I mean you (top players in general) grab ppl 1/4 your size because it's optimal for you in thinking they can't retal you. As the person who got hit, why do I have to retal on your schedule. If I can get as much land as you get an entire reset on 7 retals, why shouldn't I? Because it's not fair to the aggressor? Etiquette? Theres no etiquette or fairness in hitting someone 1/4 your size.

I see top countries who grab me who are fat, have no tanks, no SDI, low turret count. I'm going to retal that all day whenever I want. And if you have a problem with that, my tanks and missile cache would love to hear from you again. You don't want me to retal you because you want to net? Eff you, I want to net too, but you hit me first.
Originally posted by Xinhuan:
Are you guys stupid or what?