Originally
posted by
TAN:
So far, 7 people have taken this test.
2 of them are closest to the Green Party.
1 of them is fairly close to the Green Party.
4 of them are closer to Libertarians.
Interesting results so far. I'm curious about others participating and getting a larger sample size!
For those that are fiscally conservative but socially liberal, what is the rationale behind it? I mean...we just had 8 years of Bush and he wasn't exactly a shining beacon of how to run an economy. So what are your reasons?
I'm not fiscally conservative, this vote compass is just incredibly poorly constructed.
But Bush is not what I would call "fiscally conservative." Federal spending was 1.79 trillion when he took office, and was 2.98 trillion when he left office 8 years later.
I'm a libertarian socialist. I believe that pork is wrong, that corporate welfare is wrong, that government bailouts of big businesses (while letting small businesses fail) is wrong, but most of all, that 16 trillion in debt is wrong and will kill our country.
Obama, Romney, Bush, and the entire Democrat and Republic establishments are corporate pawns who will always increase government spending and increase government intervention into the market on behalf of big businesses against small businesses. Corporations are a creation of the government, they are a legal entity. Any laissez-faire economy will not permit corporations to exist. If corporations are allowed to exist, then their inevitable result is to become so powerful as to influence the decisions of public policy makers and to cause the government to support some corporations while attacking others. If you permit government to regulate industry, and permit industry to buy government protection, then you ensure a system where the government is a weapon used by big business against smaller businesses. Regulations overwhelmingly harm small business, as they will find it much harder to jump through all the hoops big businesses set up than the big businesses will. Regulation merely increases the need to hire lawyers to ensure that you are in compliance with the law. And in many cases, regulation not only requires you to hire lawyers to ensure compliance with the law, but also requires that you make campaign donations to the political establishment to make it possible for you to be in compliance with the law.
Bush, Romney, and Obama are all very far away from me economically. None of them are fiscally conservative. None of them will bring us reasonable spending by the government. None of them are friends of small business.
They are not fiscally conservative or fiscally liberal. They are fiscally state capitalists who support big businesses at the expense of small business and increase government spending at a rapid rate. I am neither fiscally conservative or fiscally liberal. I am a libertarian socialist.
This "test" is a joke because it does not realize this fact. Neither me, nor Obama, Romney, or Bush belong on the line between fiscally conservative and fiscally liberal. That's like trying to put the note "b flat" on the continuum between blue and yellow. It just makes no sense.