Verified:

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Jan 11th 2012, 11:57:27

TNTroXxor Game profile

Member
1295

Jan 11th 2012, 12:06:07

Scatter to every other tags in the near future for unable to net with constant war
Originally posted by JJ23:
i havent been deleted since last set

Jiman Game profile

Member
1199

Jan 11th 2012, 12:07:27

Another pointless war in a failing game.

How are acts like this going to improve things?

dagga Game profile

Member
1559

Jan 11th 2012, 12:35:43

^ what he said.
signatures are stupid.
Months since LaF netgained: 22

Chaoswind Game profile

Member
1054

Jan 11th 2012, 12:46:53

Tag kill? fluff

Edited By: Chaoswind on Jan 11th 2012, 12:50:49
See Original Post
Elysium Lord of fluff
PDM Lord of fluff
Flamey = Fatty
Crazymatt is Fatty 2

IXNeo Game profile

Member
187

Jan 11th 2012, 13:34:30

+bonus
IXNeo
Illuminati X
Division: EoS

qzjul Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
10,263

Jan 11th 2012, 15:42:26

Clan Start nw
EVOkj 292,753,501
Total 292,753,501

Clan Start nw
LaF 613,231,968
Rival 215,266,000
Total 828,497,968


I'd like to point out that a Rival -> Evo FS on its own actually might have been a good, reasonably even, war
Finally did the signature thing.

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Jan 11th 2012, 15:47:26

35 rival vs 50 evo + 20 imag? lol?

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 15:50:40

Pointless war, failing game, bitter people, no fun.


enshula Game profile

Member
EE Patron
2510

Jan 11th 2012, 15:50:43

from that way of looking at it roughly

35 v 70

or

70 v 105

the second one is closer just in numbers

echlori Game profile

Member
241

Jan 11th 2012, 15:54:56

er, aren't Imag half dead lol

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 16:01:30

Lol if you think this is a good war, youll really like it when alliance server is down to a few hundred people. All those people you dont like will be gone! Wont that be fun?

de1i Game profile

Member
1639

Jan 11th 2012, 16:22:41

If you've never heard of that 'level of retardation' before, you haven't been playing very long.

Wulf Game profile

Member
80

Jan 11th 2012, 16:26:03

No love for Imag? They're still hitting too.

Chaoswind Game profile

Member
1054

Jan 11th 2012, 16:32:01

If you take imag into account forcing Rival to FS EVO was rather unfair, because everyone seems to assume imag was going to stop hitting Rival...

Elysium Lord of fluff
PDM Lord of fluff
Flamey = Fatty
Crazymatt is Fatty 2

diez Game profile

Member
1340

Jan 11th 2012, 16:34:04

nobody forced rival to FS evo.

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Jan 11th 2012, 16:36:49

"level of retardation" - sounds like cool country name:)

GreenMan Game profile

Member
115

Jan 11th 2012, 16:51:55

The networth figures don't include the huge stockpiles amassed by LaF and RIVAL. The 828M nw at the time of the FS low balling the strength of their original countries, as you can tell with the current numbers they now have over 1B nw, which is chiefly due to blowing part of their stockpiles. EVO, on the other hand, had minimal stockpiles since most of their countries are restarts.

If anything, the nw difference is closer to 3x than the 2.5x at the time of the fs when taking into account stockpiles.

Clearly an even war.

Chaoswind Game profile

Member
1054

Jan 11th 2012, 16:52:19

Originally posted by diez:
nobody forced rival to FS evo.



you will have to help me with this, because KJ, qzjul and anoniem all said RIVAL had more than enough reasons to FS evo, and KJ even said he was using threats, etc to force them to FS... so wtf am I supposed to believe if you flip flop the opinions faster than a woman O.o
Elysium Lord of fluff
PDM Lord of fluff
Flamey = Fatty
Crazymatt is Fatty 2

diez Game profile

Member
1340

Jan 11th 2012, 16:58:41

I also went public saying that RIVAL has enough reason to FS EVO since we're FAing iMag daily -_-

But we didn't force them to FS us. They can always not FS us right?

It's not like we'll FS them if they don't FS us -_-

BobbyATA Game profile

Member
2367

Jan 11th 2012, 17:08:22

Doesn't look good for EVO:(

Marco Game profile

Member
1259

Jan 11th 2012, 17:08:51

Rival didn't have to FS. They could have sat there like little Evo fluffes fighting an imag who was clearly and obviously being fa'd.

Unfortunatley for Evo its Rival, and we aren't fluffes. :)

Evo was outmaneuvered this time around, better luck next time.

Evo was looking for a friendly war, quite obviously imag was beaten. With no one accepting the invitation why not create reason for war? I for one have no hard feelings this time around. Welcome to the fight Laf and Evo.

BattleKJ Game profile

Member
1200

Jan 11th 2012, 22:17:47

You're LaF's fluffes now they 'helped you'. They will expect you to be at their call every set :)

EDIT: Sorry my bad, you already were judging by how for the last 2 sets youve been demanding break clauses in pacts with Evo and been rejected both times.

Edited By: BattleKJ on Jan 11th 2012, 22:19:59
See Original Post