Verified:

drkprinc

Member

5114

Mar 19th 2018, 16:15:06

have them represent the proper losses of their allies troop/turrets/tanks.

Edited By: galleri on Sep 5th 2018, 20:54:58
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

qzjul

Administrator
Game Development
10,180

Mar 20th 2018, 4:46:03

In what context?
Finally did the signature thing.

drkprinc

Member

5114

Mar 20th 2018, 4:49:48

when you hit someone that has defensive allies it shows up as troops/tanks and never shows the true losses in actual troops/turrets/tanks.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

Gerdler

Member

2276

Mar 20th 2018, 23:48:35

When you make and SS/PS (any server) against a target with defensive allies the losses will show up as:

Your enemy lost:
xx,xxx Troops
xx,xxx Turrets
xxx Tanks
Their defence allies lost:
xx,xxx Troops
xxx Tanks

It will never show lost turrets, and Im not sure the troops/tanks lost are correct, but I assume they are.

drkprinc

Member

5114

Mar 21st 2018, 11:20:14

Originally posted by Gerdler:
When you make and SS/PS (any server) against a target with defensive allies the losses will show up as:

Your enemy lost:
xx,xxx Troops
xx,xxx Turrets
xxx Tanks
Their defence allies lost:
xx,xxx Troops
xxx Tanks

It will never show lost turrets, and Im not sure the troops/tanks lost are correct, but I assume they are.


the tanks/troops loss report includes the turrets but its in troop/tank format which makes it stupid to adjust what their allies actually have without wasting ops on them.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

qzjul

Administrator
Game Development
10,180

Mar 21st 2018, 15:40:45

oh

okay

i can definitely look for that
Finally did the signature thing.

drkprinc

Member

5114

Apr 25th 2018, 15:36:57

Your enemy lost:
11,320 Troops
46,047 Turrets
1273 Tanks
Their defence allies lost:
333 Troops
544 Tanks

see this would suggest their allies contribute near nothing to the actual defense but yet if you send even 20% less of the 2x break it will fail suggesting they have 4 allies instead with equal units.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

cyref

Member

767

Apr 28th 2018, 15:10:27

It saddens me that well into the new alliance set where bots now D ally with each other this attack report bug is still there.
Would be a fun little added strategic bump if we could view that report with the correct Defensive Ally's losses.
👽

Gerdler

Member

2276

Apr 28th 2018, 18:30:31

^^agreed.

drkprinc

Member

5114

Apr 28th 2018, 22:01:33

I know right you can't properly guess what their allies are actually giving, I've gone from 220% of the base break and broke and see their allies lose next to nothing, then assume they are getting squatfrom their allies and send 190% and get a DH! then on another country I see their allies lose quite alot and send 150-175% of base break and not fail it makes no sense.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

qzjul

Administrator
Game Development
10,180

Apr 30th 2018, 5:32:51

Originally posted by cyref:
It saddens me that well into the new alliance set where bots now D ally with each other this attack report bug is still there.
Would be a fun little added strategic bump if we could view that report with the correct Defensive Ally's losses.


Fair. It's on the list. It's just off on a tangent from what I've been looking at.
Finally did the signature thing.

cyref

Member

767

May 3rd 2018, 2:04:42

[̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ιοο̲̅)̲̅$̲̅] <== not bribery just an early b-day gift
👽

drkprinc

Member

5114

Jun 6th 2018, 20:59:28

Your enemy lost:
72,126 Turrets
Their defence allies lost:
50 Tanks

how does this make sense when this guy had 2 allies who had more then enough defense to double his....
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

Gerdler

Member

2276

Jun 6th 2018, 23:22:58

It's still not fixed is how it makes sense.

chapman951

Member

108

Jun 7th 2018, 1:42:09

^lol

drkprinc

Member

5114

Jun 7th 2018, 5:29:47

Originally posted by Gerdler:
It's still not fixed is how it makes sense.


even not fixed the numbers were alot higher then 50 tanks, hell it use to throw some troops in there.

PS his allies had no tanks either.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

Gerdler

Member

2276

Jun 7th 2018, 14:41:56

I have not done any checking on it but I always assumed that you are getting the correct losses of troops and tanks and that the turrets are just missing. so if the target has two def allies with only turrets and jets ally losses will show as empty. Theres just a line missing. I could be wrong.

drkprinc

Member

5114

Jun 8th 2018, 8:44:27

Originally posted by Gerdler:
I have not done any checking on it but I always assumed that you are getting the correct losses of troops and tanks and that the turrets are just missing. so if the target has two def allies with only turrets and jets ally losses will show as empty. Theres just a line missing. I could be wrong.


no it randomly shows troops/tanks when their ally doesn't have troops or tanks which is what really makes it weird.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

cyref

Member

767

Jun 18th 2018, 10:35:51

Originally posted by cyref:
It saddens me that well into the new alliance set where bots now D ally with each other this attack report bug is still there.
Would be a fun little added strategic bump if we could view that report with the correct Defensive Ally's losses.


(ㆆ_ㆆ)
👽

cyref

Member

767

Jun 18th 2018, 11:43:02

👽

Marshal

Member

31,347

Jun 18th 2018, 12:30:19

^that was 6 years ago so maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaany changes since then.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Galleri: Sadly pics of my boobies are on my ftp-folder.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

cyref

Member

767

Jun 18th 2018, 15:02:14

Bad math ^ it was 7 1/2 years ago

And this was 7 years ago
http://www.earthempires.com/...-losses-3727?t=1306680895
👽

Zorp

Member

845

Jun 18th 2018, 16:16:52

Seriously, what can be so hard about fixing this bug?

cyref

Member

767

Jun 18th 2018, 18:05:25

👽

Marshal

Member

31,347

Jun 18th 2018, 19:20:44

change 1 thing and old bug returns.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Galleri: Sadly pics of my boobies are on my ftp-folder.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

drkprinc

Member

5114

Jun 18th 2018, 19:25:47

I think i found the problem here.

Marshal having an account seems to be causing alot of bugs in the game so maybe the fix is to fix his code.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

Marshal

Member

31,347

Jun 18th 2018, 20:11:06

you are the source of problems.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Galleri: Sadly pics of my boobies are on my ftp-folder.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

cyref

Member

767

Jun 20th 2018, 8:28:41

I still have hope this will be resolved this set.
👽

Marshal

Member

31,347

Jun 20th 2018, 14:01:54

it won't
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Galleri: Sadly pics of my boobies are on my ftp-folder.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

cyref

Member

767

Jul 3rd 2018, 16:17:39

It's just downright passive/aggressive to allow the bots to D ally with each other and still let this particular bug continue set after set..
👽

Marshal

Member

31,347

Jul 3rd 2018, 19:10:47

quite true
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Galleri: Sadly pics of my boobies are on my ftp-folder.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

qzjul

Administrator
Game Development
10,180

Jul 10th 2018, 17:38:14

Did I not fix this? I could have sworn I fixed it last month. Maybe I didn't push the change live. I'll check in a bit.
Finally did the signature thing.

Marshal

Member

31,347

Jul 10th 2018, 19:47:24

i think its fixed.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Galleri: Sadly pics of my boobies are on my ftp-folder.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

cyref

Member

767

Jul 11th 2018, 0:36:18

Originally posted by Marshal:
i think its fixed.

why would you "think" that?

It is NOT fixed
👽

drkprinc

Member

5114

Jul 11th 2018, 5:01:32

Originally posted by cyref:
Originally posted by Marshal:
i think its fixed.

why would you "think" that?

It is NOT fixed


Marshal hasn't visited the war page ever in his life to even know what we are talking about.
(<(<>(<>.(<>..<>).<>)<>)>)

zz.ghqnet.com - 0.o
http://LaF.center - LaF
imp.ghqnet.com - IMP

Marshal

Member

31,347

Jul 11th 2018, 12:45:30

when i grabbed bots i saw ally losses.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Galleri: Sadly pics of my boobies are on my ftp-folder.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

cyref

Member

767

Jul 11th 2018, 13:53:06

Yeah you saw ally losses but you didn't see TURRETS listed in the losses did you? sheesh

Like this:
Their defence allies lost:
34,344 Troops
132 Tanks

Next thing you'll "think" is that the bots defensive allies don't have turrets
👽

Zorp

Member

845

Jul 12th 2018, 18:07:59

Definitely not fixed.

cyref

Member

767

Jul 17th 2018, 0:23:19

ok fine this will be my +bonus thread

Still Not Fixed

qzjul if E̶i̶n̶s̶t̶e̶i̶n̶ Marshal pops into this thread again and says it's fixed don't believe him!
👽

Marshal

Member

31,347

Jul 17th 2018, 13:09:28

not fixed and won't get fixed anytime soon.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Galleri: Sadly pics of my boobies are on my ftp-folder.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

cyref

Member

767

Jul 21st 2018, 3:16:55

Sorry to have to say this qzjul but enabling the bots to DA with each other mid-set and then following that up by increasing the DPA targets for the bots mid-set while allowing this bug, an attack result defensive allies turret losses display bug, to continue after eight years of reporting it on this B & S forum is just a fluff move.
👽

qzjul

Administrator
Game Development
10,180

Jul 23rd 2018, 15:56:02

I keep forgetting about it, because it seems kindof minor. But I definitely looked at it recently. Hopefully I'll put something in next time i push.
Finally did the signature thing.

cyref

Member

767

Jul 31st 2018, 7:18:21

Originally posted by cyref:
ok fine this will be my +bonus thread

Still Not Fixed

qzjul if E̶i̶n̶s̶t̶e̶i̶n̶ Marshal pops into this thread again and says it's fixed don't believe him!
+bonus
👽

Zorp

Member

845

Aug 6th 2018, 15:06:33

Still broken you fluff

DruncK

Member

1785

Aug 6th 2018, 20:59:55

Getting fluffed at like this I wouldn't fix it either

cyref

Member

767

Aug 6th 2018, 23:03:47

yeah because posting about this w/out fluffing since May 2011 worked so well
http://www.earthempires.com/...d-ally-losses-3727#172100

Edited By: cyref on Aug 6th 2018, 23:06:40
See Original Post
👽

DruncK

Member

1785

Aug 6th 2018, 23:46:17

Lmao, how much time did you spend digging that up?

cyref

Member

767

Aug 6th 2018, 23:57:54

i went all the way upthread ^
👽

Gerdler

Member

2276

Aug 7th 2018, 2:04:42

yeah 7 years... wow lol. I think that calls for this to be the most urgent fix needed. I hereby move it to the front of the queue.

KoHeartsGPA

Member

20,696

Aug 9th 2018, 15:50:49

Still not fixed
Mess with me you better kill me, or I'll just take your pride & joy and jack it up
(•_•)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6VRMGTwU4I
-=TSO~DKnights~XI~LaF=-

S.F. Giants 2010, 2012, 2014 World Series Champions, fluff YEAH!