Original policy post is not very specific. How much proof will you require? What about early set "loans" which are repaid later? And as has been mentioned by others, it seems land trading might be a larger contributor, but technically none of this matters if a MD country is not kicked out of the top ten because of it.

Pp: land farms continue to gain land and usually keep up in turns. Unlike Tan who quit 1000 turns back and we're getting land out before we dump it on as neutral ad it becomes a server farm.

Doing it any other way would be retarded.. :)

Much bigger.

A problem?

Boxcar said the only alliances that have done some sort of internal trading are ICN and RD and is hardly a important amount.

Unless you call Land Grabs that aren't douche hits = land trading?

Because I hit you and you retal per your policy and we both gain land doesn't mean that there won't be issues, besides if anyone breaks a retal policy you can bet your ass they are getting owned on the retals.

I don't understand you people that cry wolf on anything and everything, we could argue that pretty much ALL countries that hit and got retaled are land trading, even the ones that tried to outrun the retals (almost impossible).

*buzzer sounds* INCORRECT!

actually that went out of the window when we CFed SOL this reset ;)

and i don't see anything wrong with this announcement from a LaF perpsective. you shouldn't screw over your own FDPs by FAing over them in t10 anyways.

that's my mantra anyways.

screwing over a FDP is unforgivable. that's one thing you should never do.

I dont ever see a case where LaF would FA a country in to top10 to knock off a FDP's country. I think this post was just for 'haha's and jokes, as the actualy chance of this happening is extremely slim. I just dont see a MD country finishing exactly 10th this reset.

By some weird situation, with only a few hours to go a MD country is sitting in 9th and get knocked off by two obvious FAed countries in to 11th, that would be interesting.

If it's really about fair playing then you should have put it in the pacts you signed. Right now it seems like a unap with MD is just as useless as a unap with LaF.




Killing with chems probably won't even knock a country out of the top ten, which makes this thread even more idiotic.




That means so much from the guy who sent laf suiciders after his FDP, detagged countries to beat his FDP in average NW, and who FSed his FDP last set.

you mean na can't boost their ppl into the t10 anymore?

Receiving FA to boast is a netting strategy.

Killing a country regardless of any circumstance that hasn't put aggression on your clan is pact breaking.

why can't killing a country ahead of you also be strategy?

well if you are going to kill it with chems it won't even lose a whole lot of networth, so slagpit has a point

End of set, and seems like MD was all talk

end of reset is not here yet =)

Has anyone FAed anyone else to the top?

I consider MD's tag protection FA and will kill their top ranked country.

na does it all the time

LaF did it to IX back in the day so we dropped the pact and hit them the next set I think.

Tbody from RED?

TBody from IX!

MD is going to attack SoF?