EE PatronOct 14th 2018, 3:35:38
It's hard to say without testing it imo.
I went to 1700 defends on 1a this set. I started at a lower nw presumably because of tech??????
I had more acres, more of which were built and about 10bpt higher than I had. My stock didn't seem to grow much but it definitely ticked upward.
I guess my main point is somehow it still had less nw than my original at 1700 defends. I dont think you get EVERYTHING back at 100%+. Some things are still affected. It might just be military and stock and not tech or something.
Also, since I was taking a combo of br and gs it's hard to say I would have gained any if it was just gs.
You should just test it for us, enshula, on ffa. I'm down to exploit it if you prove you can gain off it and then someone will get rid of it if we win a set by killing ourselves 20 times.
I went to 1700 defends on 1a this set. I started at a lower nw presumably because of tech??????
I had more acres, more of which were built and about 10bpt higher than I had. My stock didn't seem to grow much but it definitely ticked upward.
I guess my main point is somehow it still had less nw than my original at 1700 defends. I dont think you get EVERYTHING back at 100%+. Some things are still affected. It might just be military and stock and not tech or something.
Also, since I was taking a combo of br and gs it's hard to say I would have gained any if it was just gs.
You should just test it for us, enshula, on ffa. I'm down to exploit it if you prove you can gain off it and then someone will get rid of it if we win a set by killing ourselves 20 times.