Oct 18th 2011, 17:56:05
Originally posted by Slagpit:
Yeah, you posted it out of context. Diez was saying that LaF and EVO had a UNAP.
Real solid FA work there buddy, breaking a pact because you apparently don't know how to read.
Do we need a disclaimer? "Players without basic reading skills may not fully be able to enjoy the game."
Real solid FA work there buddy, breaking a pact because you apparently don't know how to read.
Do we need a disclaimer? "Players without basic reading skills may not fully be able to enjoy the game."
How is it in any way out of context, he replies to two separate points...
statement 1:[12:46am] S|snake: if you cant, you cant, and we'll find some other way, but eug just told me we were fop'd so we may as well ask
Answer 1:[12:46am] diez: are we? lol
Question 2:[12:47am] S|snake: out of interest, did sol pact you guys this set?
Answer 2:[12:47am] diez: looks like we have a unap
So its either your assertion that your vp has no idea what pacts you have (As laf and evo havnt had a unap for over 4 months? nearer to 6?) or that you still just trying to lie and troll...
And anyway, you've since confirmed that you had a pact with sol, which would take away the opportunity for any offensive action which is specified within the pact. Breakable/unbreakable without laf getting the same deal you did, you've broken the pact.
I mean really how many ways did you want to break the pact before we deemed it void, is two not enough? you wanted three? four? more than four?