Verified:

Hunter

Member

91

Jun 13th 2019, 8:41:39

Originally posted by Mister Ed:
Originally posted by Hunter:
Originally posted by Invictus:
Nope just battleships power of 6 and expensive as he'll to buy and the oil idea along with more of a need food(battleships in theory would house alot of troops) might make a facist more competitive also?



Sounds reasonable


My hope is that the game developers will do this. We dont have airports- but we have jets. We dont need oceans. We can have navy


👍🏻

Mister Ed

Member

382

Jul 4th 2019, 8:18:39

Yes

Brigg

Member

234

Jul 4th 2019, 11:12:59

What if, instead of making naval ships actual military units, you make them Buildings instead?

Destroyers would allow a country to carry more misslies. The amount of missiles a country can have is currently limited by the number of acres they have. (It's like 1 per 200 acres or something). Destroyers would alter this ratio proportionate to how many destroyers you have per acre. Perhaps to a maximum of 1:100 (If ALL your acres are Destroyers).

Aircraft Carriers would, obviously, house your Jets. This will decrease the military upkeep of Jets, and reduce the amount of time that Jets-only, Planned-strike brigades stay on cooldown. Then, Military Bases can be altered to only reduce military upkeep costs on Troops, Tanks, and Spies, but not Jets.

This also helps support the logic of "seas and lakes being part of your land". Because when someone landgrabs you and takes some of your Destroyer or Aircraft Carriers...guess what? They just took some of your sea and lake territory!
Just Durdling Around

Mister Ed

Member

382

Jul 10th 2019, 4:57:32

I win

Brigg

Member

234

Jul 10th 2019, 5:09:08

Originally posted by Mister Ed:
I win

???
Just Durdling Around

Mister Ed

Member

382

Jul 24th 2019, 16:47:12

Anchors away!

Hunter

Member

91

Aug 4th 2019, 11:22:00

Indeed

Mister Ed

Member

382

Aug 15th 2019, 22:16:20

I 2nd that.