Verified:

snupi

Member
174

Oct 17th 2011, 9:34:47

Can be found here on Earthgraphs: http://www.earthgraphs.com/...87206ad4008dae76fad9ac5cf

Note: Please let me know if you have any suggestions for making the war report better!

dagga

Member
1559

Oct 17th 2011, 11:25:36

Wow LaF are doing amazingly well. It truly is hard to fight a war this early! Rockman was right (I think he's a brain surgeon or works on rockets at NASA or somthing)! All those unprepared countries were staunch opponents!

Bravo LaF!
signatures are stupid.
Months since LaF netgained: 22

Erian

Member
702

Oct 17th 2011, 11:43:31

Thank you dagga! It's not often you compliment others on their war performance. It warms our hearts, rest assured!

Revolver

Member
259

Oct 17th 2011, 13:13:56

<3

torment

Member
278

Oct 17th 2011, 14:29:11

dagga forgets no one allows laf to have a late war...because they would have trouble breaking countries.

Pang

Administrator
Game Development
5712

Oct 17th 2011, 14:37:42

snupi: if you can, you should make the nw graph portion use a 2nd Y-axis. :)

nice to have EG back :p
-=Pang=-
Earth Empires Staff
pangaea [at] earthempires [dot] com

Boxcar - Earth Empires Clan & Alliance Hosting
http://www.boxcarhosting.com

Kid

Member
281

Oct 17th 2011, 15:13:16

its been a long time i see Laf actually war..

bertz

Member
1638

Oct 17th 2011, 15:27:59

can they actually war? wow. so the game changed huh

LaFinglolrik

Member
203

Oct 17th 2011, 15:38:46

bertz go run your all exploring rep casher and finish 75th. n00b

NukEvil

Member
4314

Oct 17th 2011, 15:38:49

Oh, LaF can certainly war, don't get me wrong.

It's just that whoever they're hitting needs to have certain characteristics. Such as being fully set up to net, with a uNAP to be broken at their convenience, and usually outnumbering their opponents.
I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

LaFinglolrik

Member
203

Oct 17th 2011, 15:43:29

Laf cant war. Always sucked ass. I remmeber once, LaF did a AB CS :D. best ever!

PaleMoon

Member
294

Oct 17th 2011, 15:51:10

Bonus

Good stats page too - well done snupi.
"imo the true issue over there is and always has been palemoon." - Vic (Mr. Clear)

La Famiglia

Hohiro

Member
82

Oct 18th 2011, 5:17:30

Seems the FS was quite ... bad for Evo

Pride

Member
1590

Oct 18th 2011, 5:42:27

22-8 Laf. Pretty good FS.

bertz

Member
1638

Oct 18th 2011, 5:49:49

237 hpk?

BattleKJ

Member
1200

Oct 18th 2011, 6:17:48

Originally posted by Hohiro:
Seems the FS was quite ... bad for Evo


A bit painful yes :)

But I'm not sure it is difficult to look good at this stage in the set against countries that were so unprepared! Still nice FS.

Revolver

Member
259

Oct 18th 2011, 10:27:21

EVO's answer to the FS was excellent. It would have been nice to see how things would go on a 1 on 1. But it's a bit too much to ask EVO.

Evolution

Member
669

Oct 18th 2011, 11:36:50

Originally posted by torment:
dagga forgets no one allows laf to have a late war...because they would have trouble breaking countries.


Actually its because warring at the end of the reset has a lot more meaning than warring towards the end of a reset against a netting clan.

From a Sol perspective its better to war a netgaining clan at the start of the set, as you are only ruining potential netgaining performance, whereas a lot more consideration is taken as the war approaches end of reset due to the larger impact. Delaying kids from building a sand castle (opportunity cost) isn't as cruel as destroying their sandcastle when built (realised cost).

This perspective comes from our old FR system where reps are exponentially worth more towards the end of the reset. Like wise the impact of war is greater.

If you warred laf at the start of reset, they would prolly only hold a grudge for one year, if you warred them at the end of a reset they would probably hold it for 3 years.

:p
Not posting on AT as much because Maki/Steeps gave back some of my forums on GHQ. RIP my decade long blog, my blog even had replies from people who are no longer with us :(.

anoniem

Member
2881

Oct 18th 2011, 11:39:18

Originally posted by NukEvil:
Oh, LaF can certainly war, don't get me wrong.

It's just that whoever they're hitting needs to have certain characteristics. Such as being fully set up to net, with a uNAP to be broken at their convenience, and usually outnumbering their opponents.
re(ally)tired

qzjul

Administrator
Game Development
10,183

Oct 18th 2011, 19:44:11

Originally posted by Revolver:
EVO's answer to the FS was excellent. It would have been nice to see how things would go on a 1 on 1. But it's a bit too much to ask EVO.


It'd be nice to see LaF FS a target that was even remotely expecting war; perhaps a friendly 1v1? like ECM vs SoF
Finally did the signature thing.

NukEvil

Member
4314

Oct 18th 2011, 19:49:02

Originally posted by qzjul:
It'd be nice to see LaF FS a target that was even remotely expecting war; perhaps a friendly 1v1? like ECM vs SoF



Except without all the bickering due to less-than expected membership numbers on one side and more-than needed membership levels on the other side.
I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

archaic

Member
6831

Oct 18th 2011, 21:30:26

good to see you back snupi!
CandyMan: stop doing KR on our originals.

cypress

Member
1481

Oct 18th 2011, 21:46:35

now there's a class act

hanlong

Member
2211

Oct 18th 2011, 22:49:51

updated to include imag and sol :P

http://www.earthgraphs.com/...magnum&warreport=Show
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia