Verified:

bertz Game profile

Member
1638

Oct 4th 2012, 1:57:23

Originally posted by locket:

Assuming you are in Evo then I have to ask this... do you guys try to force people to be smart or do they have a desire to be? :P I wont name a certain clan or certain people who manage to fluff up royally even though they know better but it is a bit sad to watch :P


It's very hard to force people to be smart.

Taveren Game profile

Member
610

Oct 4th 2012, 6:14:37

Are you going to redo your rankings and numbers when the set actually ends?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Skype: som3thingclassy

anoniem Game profile

Member
2881

Oct 5th 2012, 0:08:12

ttt for vic
re(ally)tired

Pride Game profile

Member
1590

Oct 5th 2012, 0:14:15

It should be easy to see since he is using how many countries in T100

Laf 1st
MD 2nd and
EVO 3rd.

This is just a guess.

anoniem Game profile

Member
2881

Oct 5th 2012, 0:15:50

who are MD?
re(ally)tired

Vic Game profile

Member
6543

Oct 5th 2012, 0:17:02

New rankings to come shortly

Pride Game profile

Member
1590

Oct 5th 2012, 0:17:36

Originally posted by anoniem:
who are MD?


Soy Tu Papa :P

anoniem Game profile

Member
2881

Oct 5th 2012, 0:18:34

vic nobody cares.

pride: kudos to MD. you kept every single one of your members tagged until the end. i've seen a few alliances trying to oust each other near the end of this set by detagging "inactive" members. i think we've all seen laf vs evo over the years to realise that only breeds bad blood.
re(ally)tired

Pride Game profile

Member
1590

Oct 5th 2012, 0:22:18

Well in all honesty we know EVO is the better "netting alliance" We have some really great netters though.

I'd rank it this way.

Laf
Evo
MD

If EVO had more members perhaps they'd be #1, as I think EVO is the only alliance to win a triple crown?

locket Game profile

Member
6176

Oct 5th 2012, 0:24:46

Anoniem I thought they were interesting enough and you ttt'd it.. so why ttt it if you don't care :P

anoniem Game profile

Member
2881

Oct 5th 2012, 0:25:18

shut your fluffing dirty mouth you peasant
re(ally)tired

Pride Game profile

Member
1590

Oct 5th 2012, 0:41:51

Lol this thread got interesting.

anoniem Game profile

Member
2881

Oct 5th 2012, 0:45:44

not as interesting as my fist up locket's mum's va-jay-jay
re(ally)tired

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Oct 5th 2012, 1:52:07

Originally posted by Pride:
If EVO had more members perhaps they'd be #1, as I think EVO is the only alliance to win a triple crown?


It is a bit of a give and take, since to take ANW, you pretty much need to have a smaller member base (have fewer new members to the game). LaF took in about 8(?) new players this set from TEQ.

But with less members, it makes taking TNW harder, and you lose a lot of political clout.

Vic Game profile

Member
6543

Oct 5th 2012, 2:03:21

anonsense - if no one cares, why are we onto the 3rd page of this thread?

my job here is done.

Vic Game profile

Member
6543

Oct 5th 2012, 2:04:27

Originally posted by anoniem:
not as interesting as my fist up locket's mum's va-jay-jay


mods - please ban this poster. TOS violation

miniii Game profile

Member
144

Oct 5th 2012, 2:06:32

Laf did very well coming 2nd in anw whilst having 86 members. only dropped 1 member towards the end too, not as bad as RD dropping 7 in the last week or so

Vic Game profile

Member
6543

Oct 5th 2012, 2:08:12

new rankings.

1. LaF
2. Evo
3. MD
4. Omega
5. Sanct
6. Tie

Son Goku Game profile

Member
745

Oct 5th 2012, 2:20:33

Originally posted by miniii:
Laf did very well coming 2nd in anw whilst having 86 members. only dropped 1 member towards the end too, not as bad as RD dropping 7 in the last week or so


It was someone we hoped would get online to destock, he hadn't logged in since the 20th though.

bertz Game profile

Member
1638

Oct 5th 2012, 4:41:38

We have one member who did destock too.
But not worth dropping since we're winning the ANW anyway.

Congrats to LaF for owning the top 10 in honorable ways.

anoniem Game profile

Member
2881

Oct 5th 2012, 5:26:01

Originally posted by Xinhuan:
Originally posted by Pride:
If EVO had more members perhaps they'd be #1, as I think EVO is the only alliance to win a triple crown?


It is a bit of a give and take, since to take ANW, you pretty much need to have a smaller member base (have fewer new members to the game). LaF took in about 8(?) new players this set from TEQ.

But with less members, it makes taking TNW harder, and you lose a lot of political clout.

http://alliance.www.earthempires.com/...ranktype=anw&round=10
http://alliance.www.earthempires.com/...ranktype=anw&round=11
re(ally)tired

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Oct 6th 2012, 0:33:28

I never claimed it is impossible Anoniem. I claimed it is harder.

qzjul Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
10,263

Oct 6th 2012, 0:45:25

114 - 89 = 25
=D

114/89 = 128%
Finally did the signature thing.

wg Game profile

Member
69

Oct 6th 2012, 6:38:35

bump for vic buying oil

MADMARK Game profile

Member
534

Oct 6th 2012, 6:44:28

Originally posted by highrock:

He definitely got free land, which is "cheating" in itself.


It could of been assassIn? :P

hawkeyee Game profile

Member
1080

Oct 6th 2012, 15:26:42

Hawkeye's Netgaining Projected Rankings for this set:
#1 Omega

:)

/biased
Minister
The Omega
Omega Retal Policy/Contacts: http://tinyurl.com/owpvakm (Earth Wiki)
Apply: http://tinyurl.com/mydc8by (Boxcar)