Originally
posted by
downsay2:
Originally
posted by
jagernacht:
lol... like ebola said, i'm not even with LaF... nor am I a fan... i'm trying to provide an outsiders perspective. i actually like evo a whole lot, considering i remember pretty good times killing alongside them...
but that doesn't change the thoughts and actions being tossed around as fact... everyone knows grabbing untags/detaggers comes with a certain risk, why is it a surprise that a detagger will retal for itself? even with certain pact conditions, doesn't it stand to argue that Evo shouldn't have hit the country if it's going to ask that LaF honor some sort of rights over the countries aggressive (albeit NOT suicidal...) tendencies? Evo claims it wanted to foster good relations with LaF then it posts in this AT thread, requests that actions be taken within it, and attempts to make nonequivalent actions seem equal. just doesn't jive and we all know it.
+1
I don't remember stating that Evo WANTED to foster good relations with LaF, as it was the other way round, or at least it was claimed to be so by hanlong.
It was not Evo that dropped the FDP a couple of years ago and then FSed the other, for no apparent reason, so why should Evo want/need to go out of its way to foster good relations with an alliance that was and appears to show no signs of being the agressor and/or manipulator.
I would not have needed to post anything in this thread, if people like solidsnake could keep off threads pertaining to evo.
also i believe i said the instance when evo paids reps was SIMILAR, NOT the same.
as bertz said: laf put the country that had grabbed the untagged evoer into DR, so that changed everything and obviously pissed off the detagger. but like i said evo still paid reps.
lord tard will be allowed to play in laf for as long as he wants, even though they know he ran suiciders on evo last set and then decided to do this BS now.
kudos.