LOL

I am experiancing stability issues on my developer computer. I must have picked "10 % more to break with planned attack with jets", instead of "10% more to break with standard attack" In attacked somebody without the attacker and defender having allies and it worked

okay, I was able to break my target 10 min ago, by picking the "10% more standard strike"

Isn't it in a way that, I adverttise the open source project, by doing a succesfull attack?

In a way. But yeah, from what I remember... 10% overage is needed to guarantee 100% success. The more exact break power you send, the more chance youll get "mehuled"

I am having stability issues on my development computer, trying to get a new one soon.

Hello, so at the current level, I can predict if attacking (or with planned attack) will succeed with troops, jets or tanks. But not for example with 250 troopps, 2000 jets, 290 tanks. Is anyone interested in improving the software in github to included this?

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define OVERSEND 1.1

struct Military
{
    int troops;
    int turrets;
    int tanks;
};

struct Tech
{
    double weapons;   
};

struct Country
{
    struct Military military;
    struct Tech tech;
    double attack_bonus;
    double readiness;
};

int jets_needed(struct Country target)
{
    return ((target.tech.weapons * target.attack_bonus * target.readiness * OVERSEND) *
        (target.military.troops + target.military.turrets*2 + target.military.tanks*4)) /2;
}

int main()
{
    struct Country Target;
    Target.military.troops = 100;
    Target.military.turrets = 100;
    Target.military.tanks = 100;
    Target.attack_bonus = 1.00;
    Target.readiness = 1.00;
    Target.tech.weapons = 1.00;
    
    printf("Jets needed: %d", jets_needed(Target));
}

Target.attack_bonus gives me a headache, lol. Better use the ingame name which is defense bonus or something, right?

It's more for nah to benefit from the coding pattern.

The correct way would be to use govt_type, enums & yes,. rename that to defense bonus.

Anyway, I hope. I am not breaking rules, but I only attack during player testing with Jets. So in a way, I am advertising my code by always been able to break the target.

Another successful attack using my code.

is there like models what it looks like if you have attacking ally/attacking allies and the country you are attacking has defensive ally/allies?Right now my code works in breaking a country without me having an ally/allies and the country not having ally/allies.

Offensive/defensive allies can only send 25% of their available standing army. If something is PS'd away, then those forces arent available to you. Also if you only send jets on a SS for example, then your OA will only give you jets (troops or tanks from the OA arent sent for the SS). It's always best to ally someone with similar sized forces so that you get the full 25%.

There is some automation in my code. I need to see what it looks to have allies on the main server so I can program the help tool to include cases where I have an offensive ally and/or the guy I am attacking has a defense ally.

WeaponsTech% * GovtBonus * Readiness * (Troops + Jets*2 + Tanks*4) + min(WeaponsTech% * GovtBonus * Readiness * (Troops + Jets*2 + Tanks*4), 0.25 * (AlliesTroops + AlliesJets*2 + AlliesTanks*4)) where min(value1,value2) = lower of the two values

So how many Offensive and Defensive Alliens can a country have?

Depends on server