Verified:

Test Game profile

Member
15

Jul 31st 2011, 12:43:45

What is a good way to increase N/W without gaining more land and military??

Tertius Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1461

Jul 31st 2011, 18:17:14

Tech

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Jul 31st 2011, 20:27:34

and money
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

Detmer Game profile

Member
4240

Aug 1st 2011, 3:20:40

No, tech is far superior to cash for gaining NW =P

Test Game profile

Member
15

Aug 1st 2011, 3:36:52

Assuming you are a farmer. You need to spend your turns to produce bushels in order to have income.
So you spend your turns teching even tho you are not a techer? or you spend your turns on cashing?

cypress Game profile

Member
1481

Aug 1st 2011, 4:10:59

if you're not gaining land or planning to get land in future, you should cash your turns :P

if you're planning on getting land a bit later (maybe?), i would build construction sites with my turns

Rockman Game profile

Member
3388

Aug 1st 2011, 6:23:06

Techers are the only ones who should spend their turns teching. Everyone else should be purchasing their tech, not producing it.

And why do you have a phobia about gaining land and military?

Test Game profile

Member
15

Aug 1st 2011, 7:06:10

Since my acre/nw is currently in the low range compare to countries in my ranking range. Military increase my expense and i do think my military is consider high in my range. So adding addition militrary for the short term might be unnecessary.
But no matter how high your military in your ranking range you are, to someone much higher in rank you are still a good target due to your acre/nw been low (the 1st indicator you look when searching for target - fat land with low n/w).

New to the game. So do correct me if i am wrong .... Thank you!

Rockman Game profile

Member
3388

Aug 1st 2011, 7:12:08

You should be getting technology to boost your economy, not to boost your networth.
You should be getting military to boost your networth. If your landsize is higher than those with a similar networth to you, then either you lack sufficient production technology, or your military is too weak. Unless you play a casher, you should get accustomed to having your income be negative each turn due to the size of your military.

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Aug 1st 2011, 20:53:50

1st thing landgrabbers do when searching tgts is like you said high land and low nw (its earthers besetting sin after all these years, especially on rep cashers).
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

Seren Game profile

Member
73

Aug 2nd 2011, 2:39:40

If you're a farmer, you need land.
If you're a casher, you need land.
If you're an indy, you need land.
If you're an oiler, you need land.
If you're a rainbow, you need land.
If you're a techer, you don't need land.

If you're not going techer, then you really need land lol.

Rob Game profile

Member
1105

Aug 2nd 2011, 3:33:36

Techers need land too, the more the better. Dont be fooled.

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Aug 2nd 2011, 20:32:14

techers need land and alot especially those who will do mbr.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

legion Game profile

Member
398

Aug 7th 2011, 0:10:18

Everyone needs land
Nobody puts baby in a corner

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Aug 7th 2011, 21:28:15

*takes legion's land*
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

bungy Game profile

Member
25

Aug 8th 2011, 1:07:18

How much land is ideal before stocking for each strat?

MLChristensen Game profile

New Member
5

Aug 8th 2011, 18:02:08

LOL

about 40K

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Aug 8th 2011, 21:36:29

no such thing as ideal since more is better.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

AndrewMose Game profile

Member
1057

Aug 10th 2011, 13:39:34

at some point in each set the ROI of grabbing more land is negative, similar to exploring. The cost of the growth (cost to build, and turns waisted building) is greater than the benefit. this will depend on the strategy deployed, the cash per acre built and the turns remaining in the set.