Originally
posted by
martian:
don't forget WULFBAM!
Not gonna comment on the list but I will say that playing the game as an alliance leader/political negotiation level was a whole different experience than simply running a tag internally or playing a country.
Several of us (myself included) had opportunities to really FUBAR alliance server though politics but for the most part none of us went that far:P
Who you rank/credit is going to depend on which tag you played for and which "side" you were one at any given time more than anything because it impacted who you interacted with. That and alliance leaders that liked to post losts to AT (no idea who they may be :P )
Also what is the basis for your ranking? War victories? Server impact? Netting? Whoever ran NM (i forget) should rank high up there for keeping the tag out of trouble (mostly) and netting quietly for a long time.
One day I will read through my earth logs which I have somewhere for a good laugh:P
meh.
i was leading an alliance that joined in when digtek put together FoG and I wouldn't put him as a great. And I never sided with Samoan on anything really and MD quietly dominated the server for most of his era.
What I'm saying is that you're wrong that people can't be objective about Earth.
Also, NM/Cartoon/whever else you're thinking get credit for longevity. But that's it. Monsters are now what they have always been. Respected. Respectful. Quiet. But powerful, impactful, winningest? Nah.
