Who doesn't like more bonuses and change?

Thought it would be cool if we had a political party type thing to go with the government part.

A socialist would have higher expenses, but suffer less losses during an attack or has a medical tech bonus
A capitalist would cash 10% more, but corruption costs are higher and start sooner.
A tyrant would have 5% more effective spies, but less population.
An environmentalist can explore more for a longer period, but uses more oil for attacks.
Etc...

It should be something that sticks with the country all set. So someone couldn't be an environmentalist to get the explore bonus up front, then switch to a capitalist later on for the cashing benefit.

It would make EE like utopia which has races and personalities.

apart from that why does the environmentalist burn more oil? They should have +1 turn per attack or lower military effectiveness on attacking or something, but no oil cost because they drive hybrid APCs and tanks and they fuel their jets with cow farts.

Socialists should have higher losses not lower and they should retain the spy effectiveness boost that you gave the tyrant.

The Tyrant should have no worker strikes and no tax rebates and lower food consumption, but a 1/10 chance that their forces perform at 70% military effectiveness on each attack and defend.

A capitalist has higher TPT, PCI and industrial production by 20%, but expenses and food consumption are 30% higher and both PCI and population are more sensitive to the tax rate.

I should've put I know some of the bonuses wouldn't make sense. I wanted to put a few examples of things that could be added. Baby brain drain.

But I think it would be pretty cool. I like some of your ideas. I'm not sure how far I would want the bonuses to go.

It's almost 2025 and environmentalists regularly fly en masse in private jets to lecture everyone else about cutting their meager fuel expenses. I think environmentalists using more fuel makes sense.

Good point, sin LOL

except greta, she goes on boat. but yea 20+ envinronmentalists meeting and all fly with plane to there and most likely on private jet even if it'd be possible to share the plain or use commercila flight or even buss or railroad or train but since they don't have to pay their own bills private plane it is.

Two people have to fly to New York to sail the boat back to Europe. In other words, her carbon footprint is higher than if she would have just flown to New York. Environmentalists always use more carbon than is necessary. QED.

If she was really about low carbon emissions, she would use Skype like the rest of us plebs.