... Some folks are allowed to game the rules, others aren't. For that reason I push for total transparency, or for a lifting of all rules until fairness prevails.

I believe wholeheartedly that if maj1 and ratski lived 1000 miles apart and were friendly with the server mod, there's a solid chance they get deleted half as much.

Even less so if they collude on the markets instead of with their hits.

@TC. Then stop with the lack of evidence to refute my claims. Seems pretty simple. The changeset says it's FIFO. There's a bug. You exploited the bug. Seems pretty open and shut to me.

The changeset should be edited to not be bullfluff if this was the intention, and if it wasn't, people abusing should be reprimanded and would be if certain people liked them less.

@prime According to the rules, you did the exact right thing yes. I don't think they should have ever enforced collusion period tho, because people find ways to collude that moderators are aware of (speaking to like galleri who is privy to laf forums where they share solo country numbers and bot ops. At a minimum thats pushing it...id call it collusion. But its collusion no one seems to care about because those people are more well liked?).

Not taking a shot at you bro. I think the rules are the boogeyman primarily. Not the enforcer. Not trying to bash the middleman here for selling me a bad batch. The rules themselves target those players, because said rules were misguided to support 1 meta. Its not the fault of a good mod doing his due diligence. It's the fault of a rule invented to punish that particular type of play. You didn't invent the rule. I think if the Ratski's of the world were more popular, and the laffers of this world less popular, the collusion rules would more target op sharing and the markets than some random suiciders.

The goalposts for "collusion" and "bug exploitation" seem to get moved everytime it involves a certain group of people, and that's certainly not the fault of the enforcer. It's systemic.

5. It was Coalie and superfluff that plotted and planned the suicide on Tmac so that it would be blamed on us. There's a ton of evidence on that, stop spinning the facts.


PS: KoHeartsGPA, what the hell happened to you? You were a long time member of LaF, I pesonaly spent hours and hours teaching and coaching you, you know from inside how the alliance operates and that all this is pure propaganda from LaF haters. You are evolving to a huge disappointement :(

@Derrick, there is nothing special, SOs are FIFO. If you're next in queue and if goods hit where market price <= the price of your SO, then you will buy whatever you can based on the amount on sale or if you have enough $, and if your SO was not filled, you then move to the end of the queue.

If you'd like to test it, give me a ping and we can create some FFA countries.

I made $8 USD today day trading

I push for total transparency, or for a lifting of all rules until fairness prevails.

this isn't true and you know it. Qz said it resets but he doesn't know the timer. So it is not working like the changeset says it does.

I think that's essentially the difference between me and a former RD color, and I don't say that to denigrate what a great player and overall human being you are, gains. You know I liked talking to you before you became miserable every time we spoke, but perhaps I'm the only one viewing that as a loss of a friend.

I'd like folks to have access to all the same information as me, be placed at a level playing field as me and for me to still win on the markets and place higher than them. I will happily share my turn by turn strat to make 80m on teams (hybrid) or 5b on FFA (tech transfers) gladly. And I was the first netter to share hybrid destock which netters kept secret with the community for actual years. I don't think secrets benefit anyone, and I like a good level playing field.

Caps lock yelling at me that I have the ability to test whatever you're doing to exploit the standing order system, does not encourage me to test whatever you're doing to exploit the standing order system, rather, further validates that the integrity of what was posted about how it works is bullfluff, and that people with access to the code knows how it actually works.

If I win a server using methods that aren't public knowledge, I work to remedy that for the good of the game, the community and for parity in competition. You, on the other hand, desire most of all winning, and will do anything including killing my tags over the years with bots to do so. We're very different that way.

Please remove the ability to send FA to your teammates if the alliance has joined clangdi.
While its the alliance server it is not good for the competition between players that an alliance can just feed 1 country to get the rank 1 spot without being able to kill or interupt it.

I like how he stated..."it's not good for the competition between players" hahahahaha what a joke!

Gains basically just called TC and Gerdler "not good for competition", since they were aided to the top in the last 2 rounds.