SoF suiciding policy reminder - Earth Empires Forum

Scorpion

Member
48

Apr 15th 2011, 10:00:04

Countries supporting suiciders on the SoF tag are considered enemies. If you support an country suiciding on SoF, do not expect a NAP to protect your country. Supporting hostility against our tag voids it.

--Scorpion
Survival of the Fittest

Notorious

Member
191

Apr 15th 2011, 10:56:20

could you define supporting?

I assume you mean ingame allies but I'd love to see someone enforcing a policy that doesn't allow their land to be two-stepped

*eats a banana*
Notebook Pusher

Flamey

Member
895

Apr 15th 2011, 11:01:05

He meant the former, but the latter is a very interesting policy under consideration.

oats

Member
648

Apr 15th 2011, 11:10:45

SANTA IS WRITING A LIST OF WHAT COUNTRIES ARE NAUGHTY AND NICE.

TWO STEPPING IS NAUGHTY

OATS IS SANTA

SANTA GONNA GO DOWN IN A BALL OF FLAMES AND TAKE OUT ALL THE NAUGHTY KIDS LATER THIS SET BECAUSE HE WONT BE ABLE TO PLAY HIS COUNTRY

Ivan

Member
2362

Apr 15th 2011, 11:48:31

Im sure sof will have 2 stepping clauses shortly

braden

Member
11,480

Apr 15th 2011, 12:38:04

if a country hits sof, i'm not allowed to hit it before sof does?

Notorious

Member
191

Apr 15th 2011, 13:20:07

Originally posted by braden:

if a country hits sof, i'm not allowed to hit it before sof does?

the way i imagine it would be not for regular grabs/retals but for obvious suiciders (see the news for 119 and 215)

anything that discourages/minimizes suiciding sounds good to me

*eats a banana*
Notebook Pusher

braden

Member
11,480

Apr 15th 2011, 13:46:10

i wouldn't be landgrabbing to begin with, so i'm not worried, i was wanting to know what the policy might actually be.

i'm thinking the way you say it is more likely than how i originally asked

Evolution

Member
669

Apr 15th 2011, 14:49:46

So basically you are saying I can start a war simiply by faing a neutral?

Win?

Not posting on AT as much because Maki/Steeps gave back some of my forums on GHQ. RIP my decade long blog, my blog even had replies from people who are no longer with us :(.

Reckless

Member
1190

Apr 15th 2011, 15:59:56

omg WAR

oats

Member
648

Apr 15th 2011, 16:58:32

EVOLUTION WOULD BE ON SANTA'S BAD LIST IF HE DID THAT AND THE 'NEUTRAL' SUDDENLY CHANGED STATUS TO NOT NEUTRAL TO SOF.

CeyLonTEa

Member
248

Apr 15th 2011, 17:28:45

We just dont care

Zel

Member
21

Apr 15th 2011, 17:41:57

Sof is saying gtfo Laf #215, either that or sanct, you are next since you're allied with the suicider!

Slagpit

Administrator
Game Development
4643

Apr 15th 2011, 20:23:42

Does SoF accept policing yet?

Chevs

Member
2061

Apr 15th 2011, 21:05:39

slagpit sighting

SOF Head Of Poop
2019-04-03 21:40:26 PS the stinky deyicks (#599) Beryl Houston (#360) LaF 30638A (43783A)
En4cer: Chevs... u would have beaten me by more than 100m

Marshal

Member
32,589

Apr 15th 2011, 21:10:42

no1 hasn't tried to enforce 2stepping since so many earthers camp news and when they see untagged doing big hit they farm it.

i'd like to see some1 trying to stop 2stepping, that war would be interesting to see.

Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

Thomas

Member
1763

Apr 15th 2011, 23:38:18

I don't ever remember this being an issue. And I'm glad you guys have honored our two set uNAP for the first two weeks at least. I knew I should have limited my expectations. Thinking Helmet was in charge might actually change things was a mistake. I apologize.

TAN

Member
3241

Apr 15th 2011, 23:41:49

Originally posted by Scorpion:

Supporting hostility against our tag voids it.

So supporting hostility against your tag voids your tag?

*runs*

FREEEEEDOM!!!

xaos

Forum Moderator
237

Apr 16th 2011, 0:11:06

TAN, I think by just posting that, SoF's tag has just poofed out of existence...

Thomas

Member
1763

Apr 16th 2011, 0:13:58

I wonder if the military market booming has anything to do with this "policy".

I swear you guys try to generate issues out of your ass. Almost like a magician. Except he uses a hat. And you fluff in yours.

ponderer

Member
678

Apr 16th 2011, 0:17:14

it's simple - if your members give material aid to someone at war with SoF, SoF is not going to look favorably on your members.

m0m0rific

Kyatoru

Member
688

Apr 16th 2011, 0:20:58

You may as well violate your UNAP with all of ECM now.

+Kya

Thomas

Member
1763

Apr 16th 2011, 0:32:27

Lol. The guy was untagged. He joined us late. I didn't even know he was playing until 4 days ago. So he tags up, keeps his pacts with other untaggeds, and because they suicide he/we're responsible? That's a crock of fluff.

We can play this game all day. I'll just run untagged next set, find SoF suiciders, pact them, then tag up with one of SoF's DPs.

Since you want to be fluffs and all, I figured I'd return the favor. Live by your word and stop crying about stupid fluff.

Goofy

Member
415

Apr 16th 2011, 0:41:41

Originally posted by xaos:

TAN, I think by just posting that, SoF's tag has just poofed out of existence...

Can't ge that lucky, can we?

madjsp

Member
412

Apr 16th 2011, 1:14:04

now if you can prove that aid was given to said suicider, then I'd understand. but i guarantee you that you can't find that evidence.

-jonathan

joe3: bater sucks so bad imag could teach him a thing about war

dustfp

Member
710

Apr 16th 2011, 1:27:52

yeah, I wouldn't say having a def pact really constitutes supporting a suicider
how is one to know who might suicide, when it was just an untagged country pacting a random other untagged country for their own survival?

-fudgepuppy
SancTuarY President
icq: 123820211
msn:
aim: fudgepuppy6988
http://collab.boxcarhosting.com

Chevs

Member
2061

Apr 16th 2011, 2:46:32

thomas you get so upset and blow a gasket over the smallest things comon shelly i thought we were friends.

nobody from sof explicitly mentioned sanct on this thread stop trying to void our uNAP by doing FA over AT :P

SOF Head Of Poop
2019-04-03 21:40:26 PS the stinky deyicks (#599) Beryl Houston (#360) LaF 30638A (43783A)
En4cer: Chevs... u would have beaten me by more than 100m

oats

Member
648

Apr 16th 2011, 4:16:25

Wait, what I see is Thomas offering the following unsolicited information:

- "I didn't even know he was playing until 4 days ago"

The glaring implication of this statement is that you knew the person before - likely from an alliance.

- "So he tags up, keeps his pacts with other untaggeds"

Why is he allying up with untaggeds when he knows people in alliances? Nobody allies with untaggeds in the alliance game. If they are not smart enough to join an alliance they are not good allies. If they are smart an untagged then they are likely to suicide.

As recently as 4 days ago the owner of the country surprised Thomas, and evo, because they found out he was playing. The people untagged with who he allied were also likely acquaintances. Where did he meet these people?

The obvious answer is within EVO

Lord Slayer

Member
601

Apr 16th 2011, 4:16:36

Thomas, if you were so sure SOF would "break the pact" never honor it, or what not, why did you even agree to it? So you can just come on here and spew crap all the time? Getting so defensive shows either fault, fear, or stupidity. Which one is it?

I saw nothing from the Sof'ers who posted here that even mentioned Sanct.

LS
Innocent bystander

oats

Member
648

Apr 16th 2011, 4:18:06

Or Sanct. Wherever this Thomas guy plays.

dustfp

Member
710

Apr 16th 2011, 4:43:32

said player was a previous member of sanct, and was not expected to be playing this reset
he obviously set out to surprise us, running a country from the start and pacting other untaggeds for his own protection from LGs (the member has no affiliation with the untaggeds in question)

Thomas is VP of SancT btw

-fudgepuppy
SancTuarY President
icq: 123820211
msn:
aim: fudgepuppy6988
http://collab.boxcarhosting.com

AxAlar

Member
565

Apr 16th 2011, 6:16:06

The SancT issue with SOF was handled with Archie. :)

*chains his pitbulls of Thomas and kya up*

-AxA
Mercenary for Hire
AIM: I The Brandon
ICQ: 167324517
MSN:

Peanut

Member
154

Apr 16th 2011, 6:44:39

Cry more. That is a phrase that represents me not my tag.

Jiman

Member
1199

Apr 16th 2011, 7:44:33

Archie is such a familiar name...

CeyLonTEa

Member
248

Apr 16th 2011, 7:47:04

yada yada yada

as usual.

c'mon, be a man!

fight like a boy

/me throw snowball to thomas's face

haha gotcha

Thomas

Member
1763

Apr 16th 2011, 7:54:06

Originally posted by Lord Slayer:

LS, go back to the corner you came from. Thanks

Thomas

Member
1763

Apr 16th 2011, 7:54:18

Originally posted by Chevs:

Well... Ivan threatened to kill the country. As did you. All before I was able to respond to your initial PM. So... yeah. Whose jumping the gun?

Murf

Member
1212

Apr 16th 2011, 9:03:10

lol thomas and kya's are more like those annoying little dogs celebs carry in purses rather than pitbulls

AxAlar

Member
565

Apr 16th 2011, 9:12:20

hey, if thats what you want to imagine as the leaders that delivered a crippling defeat to ya last set, yeah sure. whatever floats your boat. ;p

-AxA
Mercenary for Hire
AIM: I The Brandon
ICQ: 167324517
MSN:

Ivan

Member
2362

Apr 16th 2011, 9:58:22

who got delivered a crippling defeat?

Pontius Pirate

Member

EE Patron
1907

Apr 16th 2011, 10:57:44

Originally posted by Ivan:

who got delivered a crippling defeat?

SoF won. AxA is sorry for hurting your feelings, Ivan :(

Originally posted by Cerberus:

This guy is destroying the U.S. Dollars position as the preferred exchange for international trade. The Chinese Ruan is going to replace it soon, then the U.S. will not have control of the IMF

Ivan

Member
2362

Apr 16th 2011, 15:21:52

lol very few ppl can hurt my feelings and none of them plays earth

Servant

Member

EE Patron
1249

Apr 16th 2011, 15:43:36

Btw,

LS is in SOF now.

Just to make sure no one confuses what he says with a Monster position.

Z is #1

aponic

Member
1879

Apr 16th 2011, 18:39:53

Originally posted by Thomas:

Your pre-emptive crying makes me want to fluffing puke Thomas. Can you grow a set and shut the fluff up? You had a country allied to a suicider and we are saying we may consider killing that '1' country for aiding a country suiciding on SOF. Since it was an untagged country just days before and a new member, I don't see why you would take it as an act of war. You are living in a wonder land if you think the suicider is a new player tot he game.

SOF
Cerevisi

Thomas

Member
1763

Apr 16th 2011, 21:15:47

No, not a new member. But our guy was untagged until recently. Therefore he had untagged allies. How is that so difficult to understand?

And it wasn't that you guys were considering it. I received PMs from 2 different SoF leaders saying they were going to.

Nobody asked politely to make sure we weren't allied to any untaggeds. And if they made such a request, we wouldn't have denied it. So this would have been avoided.

But instead of making a simple request, we went straight to threats.

AxAlar

Member
565

Apr 16th 2011, 22:08:28

Originally posted by aponic:

Originally posted by Thomas:

Your definition of "aiding" a suicider must be extremely loose, aponic :P

For all you know, the suicider was HURT by our guy being allied to him by increasing his ally expenses.

Cause you can check the NW changes, no aid was sent. And there's no proof that our guys intel ally made him any more likely to break or get ops than he already was able to get.

So if you want to argue that, I'd argue you owe us reps for us increasing his expenses and negating his ability to suicide on you more effectivey ;)

Obviously I'm not being serious, but you can see what I mean on your point of the definition of "aiding".

-AxA
Mercenary for Hire
AIM: I The Brandon
ICQ: 167324517
MSN:

AxAlar

Member
565

Apr 16th 2011, 22:09:22

P.S. LS in SOF? Gee, didn't see that one coming.

Lesson learned - SOF, don't let him lead your chats. Ivan is much, much more proficient :)

-AxA
Mercenary for Hire
AIM: I The Brandon
ICQ: 167324517
MSN:

Thomas

Member
1763

Apr 16th 2011, 22:26:38

^^ agreed.

Second HoW they've absorbed in the past year.

aponic

Member
1879

Apr 17th 2011, 0:16:13

I didn't say he aided the suicider. I am simply defending the topic of the thread, that we are considering killing tagged countries allied to countries that suicide on us. Your player obviously knows who the suicider is and by being his ally supports him. I don't see any significance in the fact that your member was recently untagged as he obviously had access to your site and could have pacted anyone.

SOF
Cerevisi