Verified:

dagga Game profile

Member
1559

Apr 5th 2011, 2:31:19

I'd love to have a subjective formula to rate wars, here is my crack based on various rolling ranking systems in world sport.


---------------

Each war, there are 100 points up for grabs.
Your war rating is a divisor of all your points and the number of wars you have been involved in, in the past calendar year.

Points are awarded as follows -

Win: +100 points
Loss: -100 points

Modifiers:

First Strike: -20 points

More Members: -(% of difference)
Less Members: +(% of difference)

Defeating a higher ranked opponent (1v1 only): +20 pts

Multiple alliances: Get the amount of points as a percentage of member contribution of that side.

Example:

SoF vs Collab/Monsters/Evo (ECM)

WIN: ECM +100
LOSS: SOF -100
FIRST STRIKE: ECM -20
MORE MEMBERS: ECM -25
LESS MEMBERS: SOF +25

RESULT:
SOF: -75 pts
Coaliton ECM: +55 pts

Evo (44%): 24.2
Sanct (34%): 18.7
MONSTERS (22%): 12.1

Final Earth War Rankings:

Evo: 24.2 pts
Sanct: 18.7 pts
MONSTERS: 12.1 pts
SOF: -75 pts
signatures are stupid.
Months since LaF netgained: 22

Foobooy Evolution Game profile

Member
318

Apr 5th 2011, 3:58:06

I like where you are going, but you are double counting with the scoring. Guess it doesn't much matter.

I'd also not include an FS score for this war.

dustfp Game profile

Member
710

Apr 5th 2011, 4:06:27

a known start date, and the option for either side to FS or not really negates any possible inherent advantage that a FS normally has
-fudgepuppy
SancTuarY President
icq: 123820211
msn:
aim: fudgepuppy6988
http://collab.boxcarhosting.com

SakitSaPuwit Game profile

Member
1107

Apr 5th 2011, 4:41:45

the whole point of waqr is getting killed, so that should be worth more!!!!
but what do i know?
I only play this game for fun!

KeTcHuP Game profile

Member
1785

Apr 5th 2011, 4:59:27

Too simplified.

How can you declare a victor sometimes thats debatable.

PS. ECM did not have the FS>
Ketchup the Thoughtful Suicidier

Chevs

Member
2061

Apr 5th 2011, 5:17:45

im not usually a flaming trolling b4stard but that is just horrible. the best way to gauge a war is just with the detailed warstats that KJ was posting.
SOF Head Of Poop
2019-04-03 21:40:26 PS the stinky deyicks (#599) Beryl Houston (#360) LaF 30638A (43783A)
En4cer: Chevs... u would have beaten me by more than 100m

trainboy Game profile

Member
760

Apr 5th 2011, 20:53:46

also swuch a difference for win or loss removes any other stat from being valid

Wyzer Game profile

Member
73

Apr 6th 2011, 1:28:03

yada yada yada

Vic Rattlehead Game profile

Member
810

Apr 6th 2011, 2:03:24

The idea is certainly good, maybe could use some tweaking to account more for the opponent. SOF shouldn't be able to finish 100 points behind one of the three tags they fought against for a single war, especially a tough, close one like that.
NA hFA
gchat:
yahoo chat:

available 24/7

nimrodix Game profile

Member
737

Apr 7th 2011, 1:45:57

hmm

martian Game profile

Game Moderator
Mod Boss
7828

Apr 7th 2011, 19:54:00

if neither side has warred before in the set then side with the greater TNW at the end is the winner :P
Otherwise the side with the greatest percentage TNW drop maybe:P
dunno.
you are all special in the eyes of fluff
(|(|
( ._.) -----)-->
(_(' )(' )

RUN IT IS A KILLER BUNNY!!!